UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): January 15, 2014

Ekso Bionics Holdings, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

1414 Harbour Way South, Suite 1201

Richmond, California 94804

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

1-510-984-1761

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

San Isidro 250, depot 618

Santiago, Chile 8240400

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):

¨ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

¨ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Current Report contains forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, in the sections captioned “Description of Business,” “Risk Factors,” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Plan of Operations,” and elsewhere. Any and all statements contained in this Report that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed forward-looking statements. Terms such as “may,” “might,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “project,” “estimate,” “pro-forma,” “predict,” “potential,” “strategy,” “anticipate,” “attempt,” “develop,” “plan,” “help,” “believe,” “continue,” “intend,” “expect,” “future,” and terms of similar import (including the negative of any of the foregoing) may be intended to identify forward-looking statements. However, not all forward-looking statements may contain one or more of these identifying terms. Forward-looking statements in this Report may include, without limitation, statements regarding (i) the plans and objectives of management for future operations, including plans or objectives relating to the design, development and commercialization of human exoskeletons, (ii) a projection of income (including income/loss), earnings (including earnings/loss) per share, capital expenditures, dividends, capital structure or other financial items, (iii) our future financial performance, including any such statement contained in a discussion and analysis of financial condition by management or in the results of operations included pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC, (iv) our beliefs regarding potential clinical and other health benefits of our medical devices, and (v) the assumptions underlying or relating to any statement described in points (i), (ii), (iii) or (iv) above.

The forward-looking statements are not meant to predict or guarantee actual results, performance, events or circumstances and may not be realized because they are based upon our current projections, plans, objectives, beliefs, expectations, estimates and assumptions and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties and other influences, many of which we have no control over. Actual results and the timing of certain events and circumstances may differ materially from those described by the forward-looking statements as a result of these risks and uncertainties. Factors that may influence or contribute to the inaccuracy of the forward-looking statements or cause actual results to differ materially from expected or desired results may include, without limitation, our inability to obtain adequate financing, the significant length of time and resources associated with the development of our products and related insufficient cash flows and resulting illiquidity, our inability to expand our business, significant government regulation of medical devices and the healthcare industry, the results of clinical studies or trials, lack of product diversification, volatility in the price of our raw materials, existing or increased competition, results of arbitration and litigation, stock volatility and illiquidity, and our failure to implement our business plans or strategies. A description of some of the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those described by the forward-looking statements in this Report appears in the section captioned “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Report.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements because of the risks and uncertainties related to them and to the risk factors. We disclaim any obligation to update the forward-looking statements contained in this Report to reflect any new information or future events or circumstances or otherwise.

Readers should read this Report in conjunction with the discussion under the caption “Risk Factors,” our financial statements and the related notes thereto in this Report, and other documents which we may file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

EXPLANATORY NOTE

We were incorporated as PN Med Group Inc. in Nevada on January 30, 2012. Prior to the Merger and Split-Off (each as defined below), our business was to distribute medical supplies and equipment to municipalities, hospitals, pharmacies, care centers, and clinics throughout the country of Chile.

As previously reported, on December 16, 2013, we completed a 3.462-for-1 forward split of our Common Stock in the form of a dividend, with the result that the 6,350,000 shares of Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to the stock split became 21,983,700 shares of Common Stock outstanding immediately thereafter. All share and per share numbers in this Report relating to our Common Stock have been adjusted to give effect to this stock split, unless otherwise stated.

Also as previously reported, on December 18, 2013, (i) we changed our name to Ekso Bionics Holdings, Inc., and (ii) we increased our authorized capital stock from 75,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001, to 500,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 (the “Common Stock”), and 10,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock, par value $0.001.

On January 15, 2014, our wholly owned subsidiary, Ekso Acquisition Corp., a corporation formed in the State of Delaware on January 3, 2014 (“Acquisition Sub”) merged (the “Merger”) with and into Ekso Bionics, Inc., a corporation incorporated in the State of Delaware on January 19, 2005 (“Ekso Bionics”). Ekso Bionics^TM was the surviving corporation in the Merger and became our wholly owned subsidiary. All of the outstanding Ekso Bionics stock was converted into shares of our Common Stock, as described in more detail below.

In connection with the Merger and pursuant to the Split-Off Agreement (defined below), we transferred our pre-Merger assets and liabilities to our pre-Merger majority stockholders, in exchange for the surrender by them and cancellation of 17,483,100 shares of our Common Stock. See Item 2.01, “Split-Off” below.

As a result of the Merger and Split-Off, we discontinued our pre-Merger business and acquired the business of Ekso Bionics, and will continue the existing business operations of Ekso Bionics as a publicly-traded company under the name Ekso Bionics Holdings, Inc.

Also on January 15, 2014, we closed a private placement offering (the “PPO”) of 20,580,000 Units of our securities, at a purchase price of $1.00 per Unit, each Unit consisting of one share of the our Common Stock and a warrant to purchase one share of Common Stock at an exercise price of $2.00 per share and with a term of five years (the “PPO Warrants”). Additional information concerning the PPO and PPO Warrants is presented below under Item 2.01, “Merger and Related Transactions—the PPO” and “Description of Securities,” and Item 3.02, “Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities.”

In accordance with “reverse merger” accounting treatment, our historical financial statements as of period ends, and for periods ended, prior to the Merger will be replaced with the historical financial statements of Ekso Bionics prior to the Merger in all future filings with the SEC.

Also on January 15, 2014, we changed our fiscal year from a fiscal year ending on March 31 of each year, which was used in our most recent filing with the SEC, to one ending on December 31 of each year, which is the fiscal year end of Ekso Bionics. The report covering the transition period will be filed on Form 10-K as of and for the transition period ended September 30, 2013.

As used in this Current Report henceforward, unless otherwise stated or the context clearly indicates otherwise, the terms the “Company,” the “Registrant,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Ekso Bionics Holdings, Inc., incorporated in Nevada, after giving effect to the Merger and the Split-Off.

This Current Report contains summaries of the material terms of various agreements executed in connection with the transactions described herein. The summaries of these agreements are subject to, and are qualified in their entirety by, reference to these agreements, which are filed as exhibits hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

This Current Report is being filed in connection with a series of transactions consummated by the Company and certain related events and actions taken by the Company.

This Current Report responds to the following Items in Form 8-K:

Prior to the Merger, we were a “shell company” (as such term is defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). As a result of the Merger, we have ceased to be a shell company. The information contained in this Current Report, together with the information contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, and our subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC, constitute the current “Form 10 information” necessary to satisfy the conditions contained in Rule 144(i)(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).

The information contained in Item 2.01 below relating to the various agreements described therein is incorporated herein by reference.

THE MERGER AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Merger Agreement

On January 15, 2014 (the “Closing Date”), the Company, Acquisition Sub and Ekso Bionics entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization (the “Merger Agreement”), which closed on the same date.  Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, Acquisition Sub merged with and into Ekso Bionics, which was the surviving corporation and thus became our wholly-owned subsidiary.

Pursuant to the Merger, we acquired the business of Ekso Bionics to design, develop and commercialize human exoskeletons to augment human strength, endurance and mobility. 

At the closing of the Merger:

As a result, an aggregate of 42,615,546 shares of our Common Stock were issued to the holders of Ekso Bionics’ stock.

In addition, pursuant to the Merger Agreement:

As a result, warrants to purchase an aggregate of 621,363 shares of our Common Stock and options to purchase an aggregate of 7,586,459 shares of our Common Stock were issued in connection with the Merger. See “Description of Securities—Warrants” and “—Options” below for more information.

The Merger Agreement contained customary representations and warranties and pre- and post-closing covenants of each party and customary closing conditions. Breaches of the representations and warranties will be subject to certain indemnification provisions. Each of the stockholders of Ekso Bionics as of the date of the Merger will initially receive in the Merger 95% of the shares to which each such stockholder is entitled, with the remaining 5% of such shares being held in escrow for one year to satisfy post-closing claims for indemnification by the Company (“Indemnity Shares”).  Any of the Indemnity Shares remaining in escrow at the end of such one-year period shall be distributed to the pre-Merger stockholders of Ekso Bionics on a pro rata basis.  The Merger Agreement also contains a provision providing for a post-Merger share adjustment as a means for which claims for indemnity may be made by the pre-Merger stockholders of Ekso Bionics.  Pursuant to this provision up to 1,000,000 additional shares (“R&W Shares”) of Common Stock may be issued to the pre-Merger stockholders of Ekso, pro rata, during the one-year period following the Merger for breaches of representations and warranties by the Company.  The value of the Indemnity Shares and the R&W Shares issued pursuant to the foregoing adjustment mechanisms is fixed at $1.00 per share. The foregoing mechanisms are the exclusive remedies of the Company on one hand and the pre-Merger stockholders of Ekso Bionics for satisfying indemnification claims under the Merger Agreement.

The Merger will be treated as a recapitalization of the Company for financial accounting purposes. Ekso Bionics will be considered the acquirer for accounting purposes, and our historical financial statements before the Merger will be replaced with the historical financial statements of Ekso Bionics before the Merger in all future filings with the SEC.

The Merger is intended to be treated as a tax-free reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

The issuance of shares of our Common Stock to holders of Ekso Bionics’ capital stock in connection with the Merger was not registered under the Securities Act, in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, which exempts transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering, and Regulation D promulgated by the SEC under that section. These securities may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from the registration requirement, and some of these securities are subject to further contractual restrictions on transfer as described below.

We also agreed not to register under the Securities Act the resale of the shares of our Common Stock received in the Merger by our officers, directors and key employees and holders of 10% or more of our Common Stock for a period of two years following the closing of the Merger, provided that the foregoing will not prohibit us from registering for resale shares of Common Stock held by such persons with the written approval of the lead underwriter of any underwritten public offering of our securities for gross proceeds of at least $25 million.

The form of the Merger Agreement is filed as an exhibit to this Report. All descriptions of the Merger Agreement herein are qualified in their entirety by reference to the text thereof filed as an exhibit hereto, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Split-Off

Upon the closing of the Merger, under the terms of a split-off agreement and a general release agreement, the Company transferred all of its pre-Merger operating assets and liabilities to its wholly-owned special-purpose subsidiary, PN Med Split Off Corp, a Delaware corporation (“Split-Off Subsidiary”), formed on January 7, 2014. Thereafter, pursuant to the split-off agreement, the Company transferred all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Split-Off Subsidiary to Pedro Perez Niklitschek and Miguel Molina Urra, the pre-Merger majority stockholders of the Company, and the former officers and sole director of the Company (the “Split-Off”), in consideration of and in exchange for (i) the surrender and cancellation of an aggregate of 17,483,100 shares of our Common Stock held by Messrs. Perez Niklitschek and Molina Urra (which were cancelled and will resume the status of authorized but unissued shares of our Common Stock) and (ii) certain representations, covenants and indemnities. All descriptions of the split-off agreement and the general release agreement herein are qualified in their entirety by reference to the text thereof filed as exhibits hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference.

The Bridge Financing

In November 2013, Ekso Bionics offered and sold in a private placement to accredited investors $5,000,000 principal amount of its senior subordinated secured convertible notes (the “Bridge Notes”). The Bridge Notes bore interest at 10% per annum and were payable on July 15, 2014, subject to earlier conversion as described below.

Interest on the Bridge Notes would have been payable at maturity; however, upon conversion of the Bridge Notes as described below, accrued interest was forgiven. The Bridge Notes were secured by a second priority security interest on all of the assets of Ekso Bionics and its subsidiary, subject to certain limited exceptions. This security interest terminated upon conversion of the Bridge Notes.

Upon the closing of the Merger and the PPO, the outstanding principal amount of the Bridge Notes was automatically converted into Units of our securities (as described below under “The PPO”) at a conversion price of $1.00 per Unit, and investors in the Bridge Notes received a warrant to purchase a number of shares of Common Stock equal to 50% of the number of shares of Common Stock contained in the Units into which the Bridge Notes were converted, at an exercise price of $1.00 per share for a term of three years (the “Bridge Warrants”). The Bridge Warrants have weighted average anti-dilution protection, subject to customary exceptions. See “Description of Securities – Warrants” below.

In connection with the sale of the Bridge Notes, Ekso Bionics paid to Gottbetter Capital Markets, LLC (the “Placement Agent”), a registered broker-dealer, cash commissions of 10% of funds raised and issued to it warrants to purchase a number of shares of our Common Stock equal to 10% of the number of shares of Common Stock into which Bridge Notes would convert at the closing of the Merger and PPO, with an exercise price per share of $1.00 and a term of five years (“Bridge Agent Warrants”). The Bridge Agent Warrants have weighted average anti-dilution protection, subject to customary exceptions. See “Description of Securities—Warrants” below.

The Placement Agent and its sub-agents were paid an aggregate commission of $500,000 and were issued Bridge Agent Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 500,000 shares of our Common Stock. We also reimbursed the Placement Agent $25,000 for its legal and other expenses incurred in connection with the Bridge Financing.

We agreed to indemnify the Placement Agent and its sub-agents to the fullest extent permitted by law, against certain liabilities that may be incurred in connection with the Bridge Notes, including certain civil liabilities under the Securities Act, and, where such indemnification is not available, to contribute to the payments the placement agents and its sub-agents may be required to make in respect of such liabilities.

All descriptions of the Bridge Warrants and the Bridge Agent Warrants herein are qualified in their entirety by reference to the text thereof filed as exhibits hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference.

The Private Placement Offering

Concurrently with the closing of the Merger and in contemplation of the Merger, we held a closing of our PPO in which we sold 20,580,000 Units (including Units issued upon conversion of the Bridge Notes as described above) of our securities, at a purchase price of $1.00 per Unit, each Unit consisting of one share of our Common Stock and a PPO Warrant. In addition, as a result of the foregoing, we issued to the holders of the Bridge Notes prior to the merger Bridge Warrants to purchase 2,500,000 shares of our Common Stock.

Investors in the Units have weighted average anti-dilution protection with respect to the shares of Common Stock included in the Units if within 24 months after the final closing of the PPO the Company shall issue additional shares of Common Stock or Common Stock equivalents (subject to customary exceptions, including but not limited to issuances of awards under the Company’s 2014 Plan (as defined below)) for consideration per share less than $1.00. The PPO Warrants have weighted average anti-dilution protection, subject to customary exceptions. The aggregate gross proceeds of the PPO were $20,580,000 (including the aggregate principal amount of Bridge Notes converted and before deducting placement agent fees and expenses of the offering estimated at approximately $ 2,877,000).

The PPO was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), in reliance upon the exemption provided by Regulation D promulgated by the SEC thereunder. The PPO was sold to “accredited investors,” as defined in Regulation D, and was conducted on a “best efforts” basis.

The closing of the PPO and the closing of the Merger were conditioned upon each other.

In connection with the PPO, we agreed to pay the Placement Agent a cash commission of 10% (or 2% in the case of certain named investors) of the gross proceeds raised from investors in the PPO. In addition, the Placement Agent received warrants to purchase a number of shares of Common Stock equal to 10% (or 2% in the case of certain named investors) of the number of shares of Common Stock included in the Units sold in the PPO, with a term of five (5) years and an exercise price of $1.00 per share (the “PPO Agent Warrants”). The PPO Agent Warrants have weighted average anti-dilution protection, subject to customary exceptions. In addition, we agreed to pay the Placement Agent an additional cash commission of 5% of funds received by the Company from the exercise of Bridge Warrants and PPO Warrants resulting from any future solicitation of the exercise of such warrants by the Company. Any sub-agent of the Placement Agent that introduced investors to the PPO was entitled to share in the cash fees and warrants attributable to those investors as described above.

As a result of the foregoing, the Placement Agent and its sub-agents were paid an aggregate commission of $1,558,000 (not including the commission paid in connection with the sale of the Bridge Notes) and were issued PPO Agent Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,558,000 shares of our Common Stock. We were also required to reimburse the Placement Agent $17,500 of legal expenses incurred in connection with the PPO.

We agreed to indemnify the Placement Agent and its sub-agents to the fullest extent permitted by law, against certain liabilities that may be incurred in connection with the PPO, including certain civil liabilities under the Securities Act, and, where such indemnification is not available, to contribute to the payments the placement agents and its sub-agents may be required to make in respect of such liabilities.

All descriptions of the PPO Warrants and the PPO Agent Warrants herein are qualified in their entirety by reference to the text thereof filed as exhibits hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference.

Registration Rights

In connection with the PPO, we entered into a Registration Rights Agreement, pursuant to which we have agreed that promptly, but no later than 90 calendar days from the final closing of the PPO, the Company will file a registration statement with the SEC (the “Registration Statement”) covering (a) the shares of Common Stock issued in the PPO (including those issued upon conversion of the Bridge Notes), (b) the shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Bridge Warrants, (c) the shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the PPO Warrants, and (d) the shares of Common Stock underlying Bridge Agent Warrants and PPO Agent Warrants (the “Registrable Shares”). The Company shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to ensure that such Registration Statement is declared effective within 180 calendar days of filing with the SEC. If the Company is late in filing the Registration Statement or if the Registration Statement is not declared effective within 180 days of filing with the SEC, liquidated damages payable by the Company to the holders of Registrable Shares (but excluding shares of Common Stock underlying Bridge Agent Warrants and PPO Agent Warrants) that have not been so registered will commence to accrue and cumulate at a rate equal to 1.00% of the Offering Price per share for each full month that (i) the Company is late in filing the Registration Statement or (ii) the Registration Statement is late in being declared effective by the SEC; provided, however, that in no event shall the aggregate of any such liquidated damages exceed 8% of the PPO offering price per share. No liquidated damages will accrue with respect to any Registrable Shares removed from the Registration Statement in response to a comment from the staff of the SEC limiting the number of shares of Common Stock which may be included in the Registration Statement (a “Cutback Comment”) or after the shares may be resold under Rule 144 under the Securities Act or another exemption from registration under the Securities Act.

The Company must keep the Registration Statement “evergreen” for one year from the date it is declared effective by the SEC or until Rule 144 is available to the holders of Registrable Shares who are not and have not been affiliates of the Company with respect to all of their registrable shares, whichever is earlier.

The holders of Registrable Shares (including any shares of Common Stock removed from the Registration Statement as a result of a Cutback Comment) (but not holders of the shares issued to the stockholders of Ekso Bionics in consideration for the Merger) shall have “piggyback” registration rights for such Registrable Shares with respect to any registration statement filed by the Company following the effectiveness of the Registration Statement that would permit the inclusion of such shares.

We will pay all expenses in connection with any registration obligation provided in the registration Rights Agreement, including, without limitation, all registration, filing, stock exchange fees, printing expenses, all fees and expenses of complying with applicable securities laws, and the fees and disbursements of our counsel and of our independent accountants.  Each investor will be responsible for its own sales commissions, if any, transfer taxes and the expenses of any attorney or other advisor such investor decides to employ.

All descriptions of the Registration Rights Agreement herein are qualified in their entirety by reference to the text thereof filed as an exhibit hereto, which is incorporated herein by reference.

2014 Equity Incentive Plan

Before the Merger, our Board of Directors adopted, and our stockholders approved, our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”), which provides for the issuance of incentive awards of up to 14,410,000 shares of our Common Stock to officers, key employees, consultants and directors. In connection with the Merger, options to purchase an aggregate of 7,586,459 shares of our Common Stock were issued under the 2014 Plan as described above. See “Market Price of and Dividends on Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters - Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans” below for more information about the 2014 Plan and the outstanding stock options.

On the closing of the Merger, our Board granted to our officers and directors options to purchase an aggregate of 2,300,000 shares of our Common Stock under the 2014 Plan. See “Description of Securities—Options” below for additional information about these awards.

Departure and Appointment of Directors and Officers

Our Board of Directors currently consists of five members. On the Closing Date, Pedro Perez Niklitschek, our sole director before the Merger, resigned his position as a director, and Steven Sherman (Chairman), Nathan Harding, Daniel Boren, Marilyn Hamilton and Jack Peurach were appointed to the Board of Directors.

Also on the Closing Date, Mr. Perez Niklitschek, our Chief Executive Officer, President and Treasurer before the Merger, and Miguel Molina Urra, our Secretary before the Merger, resigned from these positions, and Nathan Harding was appointed as our Chief Executive Officer and President, Max Scheder-Bieschin was appointed as our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, Russ Angold was appointed as our Chief Technology Officer, and Frank Moreman was appointed as our Chief Operating Officer by the Board.

See “Management – Directors and Executive Officers” below for information about our new directors and executive officers.

Lock-up Agreements and Other Restrictions

In connection with the Merger, each of our executive officers and directors named above and each person holding 10% or more of our Common Stock after giving effect to the Merger, the Split-Off and the PPO (the “Restricted Holders”), holding at that date in the aggregate 19,021,337 shares of our Common Stock, entered into agreements (the “Lock-Up and No Shorting Agreements”), whereby they are restricted for a period of 24 months after the Merger from certain sales or dispositions of shares of our Common Stock held by them immediately after the Merger, except in certain limited circumstances.

Further, for a period of 24 months after the Merger, each Restricted Holder has agreed in the Lock-Up and No Shorting Agreements to be subject to restrictions on engaging in certain transactions, including effecting or agreeing to effect short sales, whether or not against the box, establishing any “put equivalent position” with respect to our Common Stock, borrowing or pre-borrowing any shares of our Common Stock, or granting other rights (including put or call options) with respect to our Common Stock or with respect to any security that includes, relates to or derives any significant part of its value from our Common Stock, or otherwise seeks to hedge his position in our Common Stock.

We agreed with each Restricted Holder that, except in certain limited circumstances, we would not register for resale any of the shares of our Common Stock received by stockholders of Ekso Bionics in exchange for their shares of Ekso Bionics’ common stock pursuant to the Merger (the “Merger Shares”) unless we offer the Restricted Holders the opportunity to include the shares they received in the Merger in such registration statement on a pari passu basis with the other Merger Shares.

Pro Forma Ownership

Immediately after giving effect to (i) the Merger and (ii) the cancellation of 17,483,100 shares in the Split-Off, and (iii) the closing of the PPO, there were 67,946,146 issued and outstanding shares of our Common Stock, as follows:

In addition,

We agreed in the Merger Agreement that in the event that the aggregate gross proceeds of the PPO (including the principal of the Bridge Notes) exceed $20,000,000, we will issue to the pre-Merger Company stockholders, pro rata, a number of restricted shares of our Common Stock such that the aggregate ownership of the pre-Merger Company stockholders (not including any shares of Common Stock purchased by them in the PPO) remains approximately 6.8% of our outstanding Common Stock as of the time of the Merger. As of the date hereof, we are obligated to issue such persons an aggregate of 70,584 shares of Common Stock.

No other securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for our Common Stock are outstanding.

Our Common Stock is quoted on the OTC Markets (OTCQB) under the symbol “EKSO.”

Accounting Treatment; Change of Control

The Merger is being accounted for as a “reverse merger,” and Ekso Bionics is deemed to be the acquirer in the reverse merger. Consequently, the assets and liabilities and the historical operations that will be reflected in the financial statements prior to the Merger will be those of Ekso Bionics and will be recorded at the historical cost basis of Ekso Bionics, and the consolidated financial statements after completion of the Merger will include the assets and liabilities of Ekso Bionics, historical operations of Ekso Bionics and operations of the Company and its subsidiaries from the closing date of the Merger. As a result of the issuance of the shares of our Common Stock pursuant to the Merger, a change in control of the Company occurred as of the date of consummation of the Merger. Except as described in this Current Report, no arrangements or understandings exist among present or former controlling stockholders with respect to the election of members of our Board of Directors and, to our knowledge, no other arrangements exist that might result in a change of control of the Company.

We continue to be a “smaller reporting company,” as defined under the Exchange Act, following the Merger. We believe that as a result of the Merger we have ceased to be a “shell company” (as such term is defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act).

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Immediately following the Merger, the business of Ekso Bionics^TM became our business. Ekso Bionics was formed to design, develop and commercialize wearable robots, or “exoskeletons,” that have a variety of applications in the medical, military, industrial, and consumer markets.

History

As described above, we were incorporated in Nevada as PN Med Group Inc. on January 30, 2012. Our original business was to distribute medical supplies and equipment to municipalities, hospitals, pharmacies, care centers, and clinics throughout the country of Chile. Prior to the Merger, our Board determined to discontinue operations in this area and to seek a new business opportunity. As a result of the Merger, we have acquired the business of Ekso Bionics and its subsidiary.

Our authorized capital stock currently consists of 500,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001, and 10,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock, par value $0.001. Our Common Stock is quoted on the OTC Markets (OTCQB) under the symbol “EKSO.”

Our principal executive offices are located at 1414 Harbour Way South, Suite 1201, Richmond, California 94804, USA. Our telephone number is 1-510-984-1761. Our website address is www.eksobionics.com.

Ekso Bionics was incorporated on January 19, 2005, under the laws of the State of Delaware, to design, develop, and commercialize exoskeletons to augment human strength, endurance and mobility. Since its inception, Ekso Bionics has achieved several significant milestones:

Overview

Ekso Bionics is designing, developing and commercializing wearable robots, or “human exoskeletons,” that have a variety of potential applications in the medical, military, industrial, and consumer markets. Our exoskeletons are ready-to-wear, battery-powered devices that are strapped over the user’s clothing, enabling individuals with neurological conditions affecting gait (e.g., spinal cord injury or stroke) to walk again; permitting soldiers to carry heavy loads for long distances while mitigating lower back, knee, and ankle injuries; and allowing industrial workers to perform heavy duty work for extended periods.

Ekso Bionics is currently focusing primarily on medical applications for people with lower extremity weakness or paralysis. Our products have been listed with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and have received a CE Mark (indicating compliance with European Union legislation). We have sold over 40 devices to rehabilitation centers and individual users for rehabilitation since February 2012. We also have a collaborative partnership with Lockheed to develop products for able-bodied exoskeleton applications.

Ekso Bionics is at a key point in the growth of its business. We intend to further penetrate the medical market and to begin to penetrate the military and industrial markets over the next several years.

Based on technology initially developed by an engineering team from the University of California, Berkeley, Ekso Bionics’ devices employ a number of proprietary, advanced robotics technologies.

Ekso Bionics’ Medical Technology

The Company’s most current product, the Ekso GT^TM, is a wearable bionic suit that provides individuals with spinal cord injuries and other lower-extremity paralysis or weakness the ability to stand and walk over ground with a full weight-bearing, reciprocal gait using a cane, crutches or a walker under the supervision of a physical therapist. Walking is achieved by the shifting of the user’s body to activate sensors in the device that initiate steps. Battery-powered motors drive the legs, replacing deficient neuromuscular function. First-time users can expect to walk with aid from the device the first time they put on the Ekso exoskeleton, while an experienced user can transfer to or from their wheelchair and don or remove Ekso in less than five minutes.

By allowing individuals with spinal cord injuries to stand and walk in a full weight-bearing setting, we believe the Ekso exoskeleton offers potential healthcare benefits that may reduce post-injury medical costs through reduction in secondary complications such as pressure sores, urinary tract infections, bowel problems, pneumonia and other respiratory issues, bone loss/osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease and psychological disorders. For people with some motor ability intact (for example, after a stroke or an incomplete spinal cord injury), Ekso offers the potential to help them re-learn to walk again by teaching them proper step patterns and weight shifts using a task-based platform.

Ekso Bionics’ Engineering Services

In addition to the design, development and commercialization of exoskeletons for medical applications, Ekso Bionics performs research and development work on human exoskeletons and related technologies paid for by grant funding, by collaboration partners such as Lockheed, or by engineering services customers such as the U.S. military.

In addition to furthering exoskeleton technology into markets outside Ekso Bionics’ current medical applications, this work has potential applications in future models of the Ekso human exoskeleton. Many of the research projects funded by grants are focused on researching future medical applications and capabilities not yet ready for commercial development. Other projects, often funded by commercial partners or the U.S. military, focus on able-bodied human exoskeleton applications. One such development project is the HULC^® (Human Universal Load Carrier), a robotic exoskeleton designed for Lockheed and potential military applications to augment strength and endurance, allowing users to carry up to 200 pounds over long distances and rough terrain. Similarly, industrial models that Ekso Bionics is developing are intended to increase an individual’s workload, endurance and efficiency, allowing workers to carry heavy objects for much longer. The goal of these technologies is to increase worker productivity while at the same time helping to prevent employee injuries. Both the HULC and our other industrial exoskeleton products are in the developmental stage.

To date, the majority of our engineering services revenue has been in the form of grants. The Company currently has five grants underway, representing approximately $3.225 million in total funding. Grantors include the U.S. National Science Foundation, the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and the U.S. Department of Defense.

The Technology

Ekso Bionics has established an extensive intellectual property (“IP”) portfolio that includes seven issued patents, 12 pending patents and 11 provisional patent filings in the U.S., some of which are owned either solely by or jointly with the University of California, as further described below.  Many of these have also been filed internationally as appropriate for their respective subject matter and have begun to issue.  Ekso Bionics’ patent portfolio includes product and method type claims, since the devices that Ekso Bionics produces and the processes performed by those devices are patentable.  Our patents encompass technologies relevant to our devices, including medical exoskeletons, commercial exoskeletons, actuators, and strength-enhancing exoskeletons.  The earliest priority date of the portfolio reaches back to 2003, and new applications continue to be filed.

Two license agreements and one amendment constitute the licenses from the University of California for various patents and applications relevant to the business of Ekso Bionics.  The table below indicates the cross section of patents by issuing status and license status.

The exclusive license with the Regents of the University of California (“RUC”) consists of two agreements and one amendment covering ten patent cases, seven of which have issued and three of which remain in prosecution (the “RUC License Agreements”).  Inventions covered by a further three patent applications are co-owned by Ekso Bionics and RUC, with no license agreement between Ekso Bionics and RUC.  As a result, RUC may license its rights in these patents to a third party.  With respect to two of these co-owned patent applications, RUC has licensed their rights in the U.S. to an unrelated third party.  The third patent application will need to be fully prosecuted before it can be determined which claims are exclusive to us (through a previous license) and which claims RUC may license to other entities. The RUC License Agreements provide Ekso Bionics the right to grant sub-licenses. We believe that the breadth of the coverage across various bionic systems and technologies, together with our freedom to grant sub-licenses under the RUC License Agreements gives us the potential to generate licensing revenue in fields outside our present areas of commercialization. Pursuant to the RUC License Agreements, Ekso Bionics initially paid RUC consideration consisting of $5,000 in cash and 310,400 common shares of Ekso Bionics, and is also committed to pay a 1% royalty on sales, including sales generated by sublicenses. We do not pay royalties to RUC on products sold or to be resold to the U.S. government.

A remaining 17 cases are solely owned by Ekso Bionics. In some cases, as a result of government funding received by Ekso Bionics, the patents have a government use license, granting the U.S. government a non-exclusive, non-transferable, irrevocable, paid-up license for use of the inventions for or on behalf of the U.S. government, as is typical in the case of government sponsored research.

Ekso in the Medical Market

Ekso is a robotic exoskeleton, or wearable robot, used in the medical market to enable individuals living with lower extremity paralysis or weakness, due such neurological conditions as stroke or spinal cord injury, to stand and walk over ground with a full weight-bearing, reciprocal gait under the supervision of a physical therapist. The suit is strapped over the users´ clothing, accommodates a wide range of patient sizes and clinical presentations, and is currently used primarily in a clinic or rehabilitation setting. With medical clearance, the suit typically facilitates walking for individuals who are non- or pre-ambulatory post-stroke, or with up to C7 (cervical spinal nerve 7) complete or any level of incomplete SCI.

For those with medical clearance and who pass a physical examination, first-time users can expect to walk in Ekso in their first session, and we expect that an experienced user can transfer to/from their wheelchair and don or doff the Ekso in less than five minutes. Walking is achieved by the user shifting his or her weight to activate sensors in the device that initiate the steps, or with the push of a button on a handheld user interface. Battery-powered motors drive the legs, replacing deficient neuromuscular function.

For people with complete paralysis from a spinal cord injury, for example, walking in Ekso provides the powerful benefit of seeing the world eye-to-eye again and we believe may facilitate the reduction of complications commonly associated with life in a wheelchair, such as bowel and bladder dysfunction, loss of bone density, muscle spasticity, neuropathic pain and pressure sores. For patients with some motor ability intact (for example after a stroke or an incomplete spinal cord injury), Ekso may help them re-learn proper step patterns and weight shifts using a task-based platform, which we believe could be important for people who have the potential to re-learn to walk.

In 2012 Ekso Bionics delivered its first robotic exoskeleton for medical and rehabilitation purposes to Craig Hospital, a world-renowned institution in Denver, Colorado, that specializes in the neuro-rehabilitation and research of patients with SCI and traumatic brain injury (“TBI”). By the end of 2013, Ekso Bionics had achieved two major Ekso software upgrades as well as two hardware upgrades. Among these advancements, our new Variable Assist software provides the ability for patients with any amount of lower extremity strength to contribute their own power from either leg to achieve self-initiated walking. The amount of assistance Ekso provides can be set to provide a specific amount of power, or to allow the Ekso to dynamically adjust to the patient’s needs in real-time in order to follow the patient’s progression with his or her rehabilitation.

Medical Market Strategy

Our initial go-to-market strategy in the medical market was to establish proof of concept and credibility among thought leaders and renowned rehabilitation centers specializing in SCI across the U.S. and Europe, and to initiate preliminary studies on safety and efficacy. In this early phase of technology diffusion, the first two generations of the Ekso robotic exoskeleton provided full power assistance to facilitate walking for individuals with as much as complete lower extremity paralysis, and the clinical focus was primarily spinal cord injury.

Our second, and current, go-to-market strategy in the medical market is to broaden the addressable market and drive deeper adoption among the neurorehabilitation community by adding more utility to the Ekso robotic exoskeleton as a technology platform. Advancements in both software and hardware are represented in the introduction of Ekso GT^™ with Variable Assist. In their pursuit of the best possible outcomes for patients with a wider spectrum of clinical presentations, such as hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) after stroke or TBI, therapists now have more opportunities to explore therapeutic interventions and various impacts of patient/technology interaction, and to adjust therapy as the patient regains function. This means the Ekso robotic exoskeleton has the potential to go beyond helping people with paralysis to stand and walk, but also to provide a game-changing tool that may help those with some motor ability intact to learn to walk again.

Once we increase the adoption of Ekso among the medical community in rehabilitation settings, we may seek to develop a device optimized for an individual’s personal use, allowing users to perform rehabilitation in their home and to have a mobility option for activities of daily living; however, our exploration of this potential market is in the very early stages.

Potential Market for our Medical Products

Today, primary current and potential customers are SCI and stroke in-patient and outpatient rehabilitation centers in North America and Europe. There are approximately 350 SCI centers in the U.S. According to the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, there are approximately 12,000 to 14,000 incidences of spinal cord injuries every year in the U.S., and the total U.S. SCI population is approximately 264,000¹. The Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation estimates the total U.S. SCI population to be significantly higher, up to 1,200,000². Considering the range of paraplegics and quadriplegics receiving therapy using the Ekso robotic exoskeleton, either by Ekso Bionics or its customers, the Company estimates that approximately 78% of the U.S. SCI population can potentially use an Ekso robotic exoskeleton in such rehabilitation settings. In terms of the market in Europe, the Company estimates that there are approximately 300 SCI centers in Europe.

Additionally, there are approximately 5,700 registered hospitals in the U.S.³, many of which provide stroke care, and over 1,000 of which are listed as primary stroke centers⁴. There are approximately 800,000 strokes every year in the U.S., of which 650,000 patients survive, and approximately 7,000,000 stroke survivors in the U.S.⁵ In terms of the market in Europe, the Company estimates that there are approximately 3,000 hospitals in Europe.

Our goal is to penetrate the rehabilitation centers, hospitals and similar facilities to become an integral part of their neurorehabilitation programs. The Company believes that each facility has the potential to purchase 1-5 units, with the expectation that the useful life – or replacement cycle – of the units will range from 3-5 years in such clinical settings.

During 2014, we expect to deepen our understanding of the proper protocols, and potential benefits, of using Ekso for gait training and rehabilitation, and the corresponding value propositions for our customers. The Company will further investigate the potential for use beyond SCI and stroke, including multiple sclerosis, TBI, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson’s and other neurological conditions that inhibit gait. We will also expand sales and marketing efforts beyond North America and Europe through partnering with country/region specific robotic/medical device distributors. See “Current Sales and Marketing Efforts” below for more details.

Clinical Research

Ekso Bionics believes an important factor in further technology adoption is demonstrating clinical evidence to support the Ekso for use in rehabilitation, gait training and wellness. There is a compendium of existing studies examining the extra health care costs of SCI patients. These studies calculate the costs of re-hospitalization, secondary complications and quality of life challenges facing such patients.

⁵ National Stroke Association, http://www.stroke.org/site/PageServer?pagename=rehabt

We are eager for further initiation of clinical research that will demonstrate evidence of the health benefits of walking in the Ekso robotic exoskeleton. To that end, some of our early clinical customers are undertaking research to evaluate the use of exoskeletons in general and the Ekso robotic exoskeleton in particular.  Centers that have announced publicly that they are undertaking such studies that include the Ekso robotic exoskeleton are: the Kessler Foundation, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis of the University of Miami, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago (“RIC”), Glostrup Hospital in Europe; with Kessler, Santa Clara and RIC having already presented initial favorable findings indicating that the device is safe to use⁶ and that there are positive results in function with training, increase in oxygen consumption and ventilation. Increased muscle firing in lower leg muscles was also noted, which requires further study⁷.

In the much larger area of stroke treatment, Ekso Bionics also plans to build a portfolio of clinical data intended to demonstrate that the Ekso human exoskeleton can allow gait training to occur earlier in the treatment schedule, that it can mobilize much more difficult patients than traditional training, and that it will be an effective gait training device. Though the Company has only recently entered the stroke field (with the release of the Variable Assist upgrade package in July 2013), the two top rehabilitation centers in the United States (according to US News and World Report rankings), the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago and Kessler Foundation, are initiating Ekso human exoskeleton studies in this area. As in the field of spinal cord injury, the field of stroke has a large body of existing research, and there is broad evidence that early mobilization of stroke patients (by traditional manual means) results in lower secondary complications and lower length of stay. Ekso Bionics currently benefits from this existing data by demonstrating to customers that the Ekso human exoskeleton can mobilize more patients earlier, and we are evaluating the feasibility of direct research to link the Ekso directly to such outcomes.

Current Sales and Marketing Efforts

Ekso Bionics historically focused its sales efforts on key SCI centers in the U.S. and Europe. In 2013, the Company began to expand its sales efforts, and today the sales and marketing team consists of:

The Company plans on continuing to build the sales and marketing team, with a particular emphasis on adding distributors in target markets/countries and on increasing marketing and clinical efforts.

To succeed in the medical market, we believe we need to better address the concerns of a series of stakeholders at each potential customer. These include: the customer’s CEO/CFO (vision and economics), Medical/Research Director (moving their field/reputation forward), clinical staff (achieving improved patient outcomes), user groups (improving the well-being of patients) and foundation director (seeking ways to ensure successful and more frequent donor/capital campaigns).

⁶ Kolakowsky-Hayner et al., J Spine 2013, S4.

⁷ Gail Forrest, PhD., presented at the Academy of Spinal Cord Injury Professionals (ASCIP), Sept., 2012

The sales cycle to build consensus among these stakeholders and achieve a sale of a device(s) is generally 3 to 12 months. We believe our ability to accelerate the sales cycle and accelerate adoption will also be based, in part, on tour ability to build on our (and our partners’) early efforts to expand clinical evidence.

Exoskeleton Technology for Able-Bodied Applications

Ekso Bionics’ original exoskeleton technology was an evolution of the RUC technology related to able-bodied augmentation, enabling healthy individuals to carry heavy loads.

The Ekso Bionics’ team’s original exoskeleton design, called ExoHiker^TM, was completed in February 2005 and was intended to help hikers carry heavy loads over extended periods of time. The ExoHiker demonstrated load carriage at power consumption levels that were approximately 1,000 times lower than the state-of-the-art human exoskeletons of the time. There was no user interface required to operate the device. Instead, ExoHiker responded to the movements of the person wearing the device. It could be easily strapped on or off, and it had a small handheld LCD display used to configure the device. The ExoHiker weighed approximately 30 pounds and operated at an average speed of 2.5 miles per hour for 42 miles with one 80 watt-hour lithium polymer battery.

ExoHiker evolved into the ExoClimber^TM, which injected power when ascending stairs and climbing steep slopes. It weighed 50 pounds and could assist the wearer to ascend 600 feet vertically with a 150-pound load. Neither ExoHiker nor ExoClimber was commercialized. The third generation device is called the Human Universal Load Carrier (HULC) and includes hip actuation used to assist the user in swinging his or her legs during walking, even on level ground.

This development of able-bodied, powered and non-powered exoskeletons continues with funding from government grants and engineering contracts for Lockheed and U.S. government customers. Investing in the ongoing development of exoskeleton technology through these non-dilutive forms of funding is intended to help Ekso Bionics remain at the forefront of this nascent bionic robotics technology, working with leaders in complementary fields such as materials, battery and sensor technology.

One of Ekso Bionics’ development partners for able-bodied applications is Lockheed, for whom the Company continues to provide research and development services. The Company’s collaboration with Lockheed focuses on anthropomorphic exoskeleton technology used to augment the strength and endurance of people.  For the commercial (able-bodied) field of use, the Company and Lockheed have co-exclusive rights, with the Company having the right to sub-license technology and Lockheed having the right to sub-license only with our consent.  For the government (able-bodied) field of use, Lockheed and the Company have co-exclusive rights to military markets through 2017.  So long as certain annual minimum obligations are met, Lockheed will obtain exclusive rights to the government market after 2017. 

Since 2008, Lockheed has purchased approximately $6 million in non-recurring engineering services from Ekso Bionics for the further development of the HULC and other exoskeletons. The HULC exoskeleton development continues with Lockheed funding. The most recent demonstration units allow soldiers and other service members to carry up to 200 pounds over long distances and rough terrain. More recently, Lockheed and Ekso Bionics initiated development of a non-powered exoskeleton called MANTIS^TM.  MANTIS is designed to allow industrial workers in a dynamic and unstructured work environment to achieve their tasks with reduced musculoskeletal injuries related to lifting and working with heavy tools. Although the Company believes the MANTIS and similar industrial exoskeletons have the potential to help prevent workforce injuries, improve productivity and over time reduce workmen’s compensation and related costs, the Company has invested little of its own resources to date on these efforts. The focus of our work so far has been in building an IP portfolio that will help us enter that market at a future date.

It is important to note that both the HULC and industrial exoskeleton products are in the developmental stage. Nevertheless, Ekso Bionics plans to continue to pursue able-bodied exoskeleton technology and will seek to commercialize products on our own or with partners when and if appropriate

In December 2013, the Company was awarded a twelve-month, $1 million contract by United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) to develop design, build, test and deliver a next generation military exoskeleton prototype.  The first four milestones relate to the development and delivery of a functional prototype exoskeleton device that significantly reduces the load on users while introducing a negligible metabolic impact and meets other specifications set forth in the agreement. If all four of the prototype milestones are achieved, Ekso will be entitled to payment of approximately $850,000. The final milestone of the project, which would result in a payment to Ekso of approximately $150,000, relates to the submission of a report summarizing testing results and a recommended path forward. This is the first award granted under USSOCOM's TALOS (Tactical Assault Light Operator Suit) project.

Governmental Regulation and Product Approval

U.S. Regulation

Ekso Bionics’ medical technology products and operations are subject to regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and various other federal and state agencies, as well as by foreign governmental agencies. These agencies enforce laws and regulations that govern the development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, advertising, marketing and distribution, and market surveillance of the Company’s medical device products.

Under the U.S. Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the “FFDCA”), medical devices are classified into one of three classes — Class I, Class II or Class III — depending on the degree of risk associated with each medical device and the extent of control needed to ensure safety and effectiveness. Our current medical products are categorized as Class I. Class I devices are those for which safety and effectiveness can be assured by adherence to a set of guidelines, which include compliance with the applicable portions of the FDA's Quality System Regulation (“QSR”), facility registration and product listing, reporting of adverse medical events, and appropriate, truthful and non-misleading labeling, advertising, and promotional materials (the “General Controls”).

Ekso Bionics actively maintains FDA 21 CFR Part 820 Quality System Regulation and ISO 13485:2003 Quality Management Systems that establish standards for its product design, manufacturing, and distribution processes. Following the introduction of a product, the FDA and foreign agencies engage in periodic reviews of our quality systems, as well as product performance and advertising and promotional materials. These regulatory controls, as well as any changes in FDA policies, can affect the time and cost associated with the development, introduction and continued availability of new products. Where possible, Ekso Bionics anticipates these factors in our product development processes. These agencies possess the authority to take various administrative and legal actions against the Company, such as product recalls, product seizures and other civil and criminal sanctions.

Foreign Regulation

In addition to regulations in the United States, Ekso Bionics will be subject to a variety of foreign regulations governing clinical trials and commercial sales and distribution of our products in foreign countries. Whether or not the Company obtains FDA approval for a product, Ekso Bionics must obtain approval of a product by the comparable regulatory authorities of foreign countries before the Company can commence clinical trials or marketing of the product in those countries. The approval process varies from country to country, and the time may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA approval. The requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials, product licensing, pricing and reimbursement vary greatly from country to country.

The policies of the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities may change and additional government regulations may be enacted which could prevent or delay regulatory approval of our products and could also increase the cost of regulatory compliance. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of adverse governmental regulation that might arise from future legislative or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad.

Competition

The medical technology, industrial robotics and military equipment industries are characterized by intense competition and rapid technological change. We believe a number of other companies are developing competitive technology and devices for both the medical and able-bodied fields of use, and many of these competitors have significantly more financial and other resources than we possess.

In the medical field, we face competition from companies that are focused on technology for rehabilitation of patients suffering from stroke and related neurological disabilities as well as from companies that focused on SCI. In stroke, Cyberdyne is developing over-ground exoskeletons, and Hocoma, AlterG, Aretech and Reha Technology are selling treadmill-based gait therapies. In SCI, Argo Medical Technologies and Rex Bionics sell over-ground exoskeletons. Parker Hannifin has announced plans to sell over-ground exoskeletons beginning in 2015. In the able-bodied field, Raytheon, Panasonic, Honda and Cyberdyne are each developing some form of exoskeleton for military and industrial applications.

The field of robotic exoskeleton technology remains in infancy. As this field develops, we believe we will face increased competition on the basis of product features, clinical outcomes, price, services and other factors. Our competitive position will depend on multiple, complex factors, including our ability to achieve market acceptance for our products, develop new products, implement production and marketing plans, secure regulatory approvals for products under development and protect our intellectual property. In some instances, competitors may also offer, or may attempt to develop, alternative therapies for disease states that may be delivered without a medical device.

Employees

We employ 44 persons on a full time basis, including five in Europe. The Company currently plans to hire an additional 10 to 15 full time employees within the next three months, whose principal responsibilities will be the support of our sales, manufacturing, marketing, and clinical development activities. Should the Company secure further contracts for engineering services for our government work/clients, we would also have to hire additional engineering personnel.

Description of Properties

Our principal executive offices are currently located at 1414 Harbour Way South, Suite 1201, Richmond, CA 94804, where the Company leases approximately 45,000 square feet. The Company believes this facility is adequate for its current needs, including providing the space and infrastructure to assemble Ekso exoskeletons and to accommodate its development work for able-bodied applications per its current operating plan.

Ekso Bionics does not own any real property.

RISK FACTORS

An investment in OUR securities is highly speculative and involves a high degree of risk. We face a variety of risks that may affect our operations or financial results and many of those risks are driven by factors that we cannot control or predict. Before investing in the securities you should carefully consider the following risks, together with the financial and other information contained in this report. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In that case, the trading price of our common stock would likely decline and you may lose all or a part of your investment. Only those investors who can bear the risk of loss of their entire investment should consider an investment in our securities.

THIS REPORT CONTAINS CERTAIN STATEMENTS RELATING TO FUTURE EVENTS OR THE FUTURE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF OUR COMPANY. PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS ARE CAUTIONED THAT SUCH STATEMENTS ARE ONLY PREDICTIONS AND INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES, AND THAT ACTUAL EVENTS OR RESULTS MAY DIFFER MATERIALLY. IN EVALUATING SUCH STATEMENTS, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD SPECIFICALLY CONSIDER THE VARIOUS FACTORS IDENTIFIED IN THIS REPORT, INCLUDING THE MATTERS SET FORTH BELOW, WHICH COULD CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE INDICATED BY SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS.

If any of the following or other risks materialize, the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected which, in turn, could adversely impact the value of our Common Stock. In such a case, investors in our Common Stock could lose all or part of their investment.

Prospective investors should consider carefully whether an investment in the Company is suitable for them in light of the information contained in this Report and the financial resources available to them. The risks described below do not purport to be all the risks to which the Company or the Company could be exposed. This section is a summary of certain risks and is not set out in any particular order of priority. They are the risks that we presently believe are material to the operations of the Company. Additional risks of which we are not presently aware or which we presently deem immaterial may also impair the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

 Risks Related to our Business and the Industry in Which We Operate

We have a limited operating history upon which investors can evaluate our future prospects.

Although Ekso Bionics was incorporated in 2005, it did not sell its first Ekso medical device until recently, in 2012. Therefore, we have limited operating history upon which an evaluation of our business plan or performance and prospects can be made. The business and prospects of the Company must be considered in the light of the potential problems, delays, uncertainties and complications encountered in connection with a newly established business. The risks include, but are not limited to, the possibility that we will not be able to develop functional and scalable products and services, or that although functional and scalable, our products and services will not be economical to market; that our competitors hold proprietary rights that preclude us from marketing such products; that our competitors market a superior or equivalent product; that we are not able to upgrade and enhance our technologies and products to accommodate new features and expanded service offerings; or the failure to receive necessary regulatory clearances for our products. To successfully introduce and market our products at a profit, we must establish brand name recognition and competitive advantages for our products. There are no assurances that the Company can successfully address these challenges. If it is unsuccessful, the Company and its business, financial condition and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.

Given the limited operating history, management has little basis on which to forecast future demand for our products from our existing customer base, much less new customers. The current and future expense levels of the Company are based largely on estimates of planned operations and future revenues rather than experience. It is difficult to accurately forecast future revenues because the business of the Company is new and its market has not been developed. If the forecasts for the Company prove incorrect, the business, operating results and financial condition of the Company will be materially and adversely affected. Moreover, the Company may be unable to adjust its spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unanticipated reduction in revenue. As a result, any significant reduction in revenues would immediately and adversely affect the business, financial condition and operating results of the Company.

The industries in which the Company operates are highly competitive and subject to rapid technological change.  If our competitors are better able to develop and market products that are safer, more effective, less costly, easier to use, or are otherwise more attractive, we may be unable to compete effectively with other companies.

The medical technology, industrial robotics and military equipment industries are characterized by intense competition and rapid technological change, and we will face competition on the basis of product features, clinical outcomes, price, services and other factors. Competitors may include large medical device and other companies, some of which have significantly greater financial and marketing resources than we do, and firms that are more specialized than we are with respect to particular markets. Our competition may respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies, undertake more extensive marketing campaigns, have greater financial, marketing and other resources than we do or may be more successful in attracting potential customers, employees and strategic partners.

Our competitive position will depend on multiple, complex factors, including our ability to achieve market acceptance for our products, develop new products, implement production and marketing plans, secure regulatory approvals for products under development and protect our intellectual property. In some instances, competitors may also offer, or may attempt to develop, alternative therapies for disease states that may be delivered without a medical device. The development of new or improved products, processes or technologies by other companies may render our products or proposed products obsolete or less competitive. The entry into the market of manufacturers located in low-cost manufacturing locations may also create pricing pressure, particularly in developing markets. Our future success depends, among other things, upon our ability to compete effectively against current technology, as well as to respond effectively to technological advances, and upon our ability to successfully implement our marketing strategies and execute our research and development plan.

Our products may not be accepted in the market.

We cannot be certain that our current products or any other products we may develop or market will achieve or maintain market acceptance.  Market acceptance of our products depends on many factors, including the Company’s ability to convince key opinion leaders to provide recommendations regarding our products, convince distributors and customers that our technology is an attractive alternative to other technologies, supply and service sufficient quantities of products directly or through marketing alliances, and price products competitively in light of the current macroeconomic environment, which, particularly in the case of the medical device industry, are becoming increasingly price sensitive.

Dependence on patent and other proprietary rights and failing to protect such rights or to be successful in litigation related to such rights may result in our payment of significant monetary damages or impact offerings in our product portfolios.

Our long-term success largely depends on our ability to market technologically competitive products. If we fail to obtain or maintain adequate intellectual property protection, we may not be able to prevent third parties from using our proprietary technologies or may lose access to technologies critical to our products. Also, our currently pending or future patent applications may not result in issued patents, and issued patents are subject to claims concerning priority, scope and other issues.

Intellectual property litigation and infringement claims could cause us to incur significant expenses or prevent us from selling certain of our products.

The industries in which we operate, including, in particular, the medical device industry, are characterized by extensive intellectual property litigation and, from time to time, we might be the subject of claims by third parties of potential infringement or misappropriation. Regardless of outcome, such claims are expensive to defend and divert the time and effort of our management and operating personnel from other business issues. A successful claim or claims of patent or other intellectual property infringement against us could result in our payment of significant monetary damages and/or royalty payments or negatively impact our ability to sell current or future products in the affected category and could have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flows, financial condition or results of operations.

Some of the patents in the intellectual property portfolio are not within our complete control, which could reduce the value of such patents.

Some of our U.S. patent applications (which have associated international applications) are co-owned by the Regents of the University of California Berkeley. The Regents of the University of California Berkeley has licensed its rights under many of these patent applications to us, but we do not have a license to their rights under three of these patent applications. With respect to two of these co-owned patent applications, the Regents of the University of California Berkeley has licensed their rights in the U.S. to an unrelated third party. The third patent application will need to be fully prosecuted before it can be determined which claims are exclusive to us (through a previous license) and which claims the Regents of the University of California Berkeley may license to other entities. We do not have complete control over the prosecution of these patent applications. In addition, the license of patent rights under these patents to third parties could reduce the value of the Company’s patent portfolio and limit any income or license fees that we might receive if we were to attempt to transfer or license our rights under any of our co-owned patents.

Enforcing intellectual property rights in foreign nations for military technology may be more problematic than enforcement in other industries.

In many countries, governments reserve the right to allow local manufacturers to infringe patents in cases where it is beneficial to their national security to do so. This could result in additional competition for us or our licensees from local manufacturers in foreign countries even though those manufacturers are infringing patents we hold in those countries, which could adversely affect our ability to sell our products in those countries for military use.

We are subject to extensive governmental regulations relating to the manufacturing, labeling and marketing of our products.

Our medical technology products and operations are subject to regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”), the European Union and other governmental authorities both inside and outside of the United States. These agencies enforce laws and regulations that govern the development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, advertising, marketing and distribution, and market surveillance of our medical products.

Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the “FFDCA”), medical devices are classified into one of three classes — Class I, Class II or Class III — depending on the degree of risk associated with each medical device and the extent of control needed to ensure safety and effectiveness. We believe our current products are Class I medical devices. Class I devices are those for which safety and effectiveness can be assured by adherence to a set of guidelines, which include compliance with the applicable portions of the FDA's Quality System Regulation, facility registration and product listing, reporting of adverse medical events, and appropriate, truthful and non-misleading labeling, advertising, and promotional materials.

Following the introduction of a product, these agencies will also periodically review our manufacturing processes and product performance. The process of complying with the applicable good manufacturing practices, adverse event reporting, clinical trial and other requirements can be costly and time consuming, and could delay or prevent the production, manufacturing or sale of our products. In addition, if we fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, it could result in fines, delays or suspensions of regulatory clearances, closure of manufacturing sites, seizures or recalls of products and damage to our reputation. Recent changes in enforcement practice by the FDA, European Union and other agencies have resulted in increased enforcement activity, which increases the compliance risk for the Company and other companies in our industry. In addition, governmental agencies may impose new requirements regarding registration, labeling or prohibited materials that may require us to modify or re-register products already on the market or otherwise impact our ability to market our products in those countries. Once clearance or approval has been obtained for a product, there is an obligation to ensure that all applicable FDA and other regulatory requirements continue to be met.

We may be subject to penalties and may be precluded from marketing our products if we fail to comply with extensive governmental regulations.

We believe that our Ekso, Ekso 1.1, and Ekso GT products are FDA Class I medical devices when used in clinical settings. However, the FDA has not made any determination about whether our medical products are Class I medical devices. Such a determination is not necessary in order for us to list a Class I device with the FDA and bring that device to the U.S. market. However, from time to time, the FDA may disagree with the classification of a new Class I medical device and require the manufacturer of that device to apply for approval as a Class II or Class III medical device. In the event that the FDA determines that our medical products should be reclassified as Class II or Class III medical devices, we could be precluded from marketing the devices for clinical use within the United States for months, years or longer depending on the specific change the classification. Reclassification of our products as Class II or Class III medical devices could significantly increase our regulatory costs, including the timing and expense associates with required clinical trials and other costs.

The FDA and non-U.S. regulatory authorities require that our products be manufactured according to rigorous standards. These regulatory requirements may significantly increase our production costs and may even prevent us from making our products in amounts sufficient to meet market demand.  If we change our approved manufacturing process, the FDA may need to review the process before it may be used.  Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements discussed could subject us to enforcement actions, including warning letters, fines, injunctions and civil penalties against us, recall or seizure of our products, operating restrictions, partial suspension or total shutdown of our production, and criminal prosecution.

Federal, state and non-U.S. regulations regarding the manufacture and sale of medical devices are subject to future changes.  The complexity, timeframes and costs associated with obtaining marketing clearances are unknown.  Although we cannot predict the impact, if any, these changes might have on our business, the impact could be material.

Certain of our competitors have reported injuries caused by the malfunction of human exoskeleton devices (in at least one case to the FDA). Injuries caused by the malfunction or misuse of human exoskeleton devices, even where such malfunction or misuse occurs with respect to one of our competitor’s products, could cause regulatory agencies to implement more conservative regulations on the medical human exoskeleton industry, which could significantly increase our operating costs.

Product defects could adversely affect the results of our operations.

The design, manufacture and marketing of our products involve certain inherent risks. Manufacturing or design defects, unanticipated use of our products, or inadequate disclosure of risks relating to the use of our products can lead to injury or other adverse events. These events could lead to recalls or safety alerts relating to our products (either voluntary or required by the FDA or similar governmental authorities in other countries), and could result, in certain cases, in the removal of a product from the market. A recall could result in significant costs, as well as negative publicity and damage to our reputation that could reduce demand for our products. Personal injuries relating to the use of our products could also result in product liability claims being brought against us. In some circumstances, such adverse events could also cause delays in new product approvals.

When a medical human exoskeleton is used by a paralyzed individual to walk, the individual relies completely on the exoskeleton to hold them upright. There are many exoskeleton components that, if they were to fail catastrophically, could cause a fall resulting in severe injury or death of the patient. Such occurrences could bring about costly litigation and could also bring about regulatory activity on the part of the FDA or its foreign counterparts which could interfere with our ability to market our products.

When an industrial or military exoskeleton is used by a healthy individual—for example to carry a heavy load—malfunction of the device at an inopportune moment (such as when descending a stairway or navigating a precarious trail) could cause a fall resulting in severe injury or death of the person using the device. Such occurrences could bring about costly litigation and could also bring about regulatory activity on the part of OSHA or its foreign counterparts which could interfere with our ability to market our products.

We could be exposed to significant liability claims if we are unable to obtain insurance at acceptable costs and adequate levels or otherwise protect ourselves against potential product liability claims.

The testing, manufacture, marketing and sale of medical devices entail the inherent risk of liability claims or product recalls. Product liability insurance is expensive and may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. A successful product liability claim or product recall could inhibit or prevent the successful commercialization of our products, cause a significant financial burden on the Company, or both, which in either case could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

If we are not able to both obtain and maintain adequate levels of third-party reimbursement for our products, it would have a material adverse effect on our business.

Healthcare providers and related facilities are generally reimbursed for their services through payment systems managed by various governmental agencies worldwide, private insurance companies, and managed care organizations. The manner and level of reimbursement in any given case may depend on the site of care, the procedure(s) performed, the final patient diagnosis, the device(s) utilized, available budget, or a combination of these factors, and coverage and payment levels are determined at each payer’s discretion. The coverage policies and reimbursement levels of these third-party payers may impact the decisions of healthcare providers and facilities regarding which medical products they purchase and the prices they are willing to pay for those products. Thus, changes in reimbursement levels or methods may either positively or negatively impact sales of our products.

The Company has no direct control over payer decision-making with respect to coverage and payment levels for our medical device products. Additionally, we expect many payers to continue to explore cost-containment strategies (e.g., comparative and cost-effectiveness analyses, so-called “pay-for-performance” programs implemented by various public and private payers, and expansion of payment bundling schemes such as Accountable Care Organizations, and other such methods that shift medical cost risk to providers) that may potentially impact coverage and/or payment levels for our current products or products we develop.

As our product offerings are diverse across healthcare settings, they are affected to varying degrees by the many payment systems. Therefore, individual countries, product lines or product classes may be impacted by changes to these systems.

Changes in reimbursement practices of third-party payers could affect the demand for our products and the prices at which they are sold.

The sales of our products could depend, in part, on the extent to which healthcare providers and facilities or individual users are reimbursed by government authorities, private insurers and other third-party payers for the costs of our products or the services performed with our products. The coverage policies and reimbursement levels of third-party payers, which can vary among public and private sources and by country, may affect which products customers purchase and the prices they are willing to pay for those products in a particular jurisdiction. Reimbursement rates can also affect the acceptance rate of new technologies. Legislative or administrative reforms to reimbursement systems in the United States or abroad, or changes in reimbursement rates by private payers, could significantly reduce reimbursement for procedures using the Company’s products or result in denial of reimbursement for those products, which would adversely affect customer demand or the price customers may be willing to pay for such products.

Clinical outcome studies regarding our products may not provide sufficient data to either cause third-party payers to approve reimbursement or to make human exoskeletons a standard of care.

Our business plan relies on broad adoption of human exoskeletons to provide neuro-rehabilitation in the form of gait training to individuals who have suffered a neurological injury or disorder. Although use of human exoskeletons in neuro-rehabilitation is new, use of robotic devices to provide gait training has been going on for over a decade and the clinical studies relating to such devices have had both positive and negative outcomes. Much of the rehabilitation community has rejected the use of such devices based on the data from some of these studies. Although we believe that human exoskeletons will outperform such robotic equipment, this has not been proven. Furthermore, it may prove impossible to prove an advantage in a timely manner, or at all, which could prevent broad adoption of our products.

Part of our business plan relies on broad adoption of the Ekso device to provide “early mobilization” of individuals who have been immobilized by an injury, disease, or other condition. Although the health benefits of other methods of “early mobilization” have been demonstrated in clinical studies in fields such as stroke, those studies did not test early mobilization with human exoskeletons directly. It may be necessary to provide outcome studies on early mobilization with exoskeletons directly in order to convince the medical community of their effectiveness. Such studies have not been designed at this time, and may be too large and too costly for us and our partners to conduct.

The technology of load carriage exoskeletons (such as the HULC human exoskeleton) is at a very early stage of development and the technology may not be broadly adopted in military or other markets.

The most recent testing of our HULC technology showed that the metabolic cost of load carriage while wearing the device varied greatly from subject to subject. This implied that the device helped some subjects and hindered others. The source of this phenomenon and whether it will go away with training of the subjects using the device remains unknown and requires further research and development. This phenomenon and others like it could limit the adoption of such devices by militaries or other customers to a certain portion of their personnel or in the worst case could make it impractical to deploy at all. If Lockheed is unable to market the HULC exoskeleton, it would negatively affect our results of operations.

We may be unable to attract and retain key employees.

The success of the Company depends on our ability to identify, hire, train and retain highly qualified managerial, technical and sales and marketing personnel. In July 2013, thirty Ekso employees were furloughed in order to reduce significantly our cash expenses pending the completion of a financing. Some of these employees have since accepted employment with other firms, and, therefore, will need to be replaced by new hires. In addition, as the Company introduces new products or services, it will need to hire additional personnel. Currently, competition for personnel with the required knowledge, skill and experiences is intense, and the Company may not be able to attract, assimilate or retain such personnel. The inability to attract and retain the necessary managerial, technical and sales and marketing personnel could have a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations and financial condition of the Company.

We will experience long and variable sales cycles, which could have a negative impact on our results of operations for any given quarter and may result in volatility in our stock price.

The Ekso device has a lengthy sales and purchase order cycle because it is a major capital item and generally requires the approval of senior management at purchasing institutions, which may contribute to substantial fluctuations in our quarterly operating results. Other factors that may cause our operating results to fluctuate include:

In addition to these factors, expenditures are based, in part, on expected future sales.  If sales levels in a particular quarter do not meet expectations, we may be unable to adjust operating expenses quickly enough to compensate for the shortfall of sales, and our results of operations may be adversely affected.

International sales of our products account for a portion of our revenues, which will expose the Company to certain operating risks. If we are unable to successfully manage our international activities, our net sales, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely impacted.

Our business currently depends in part on our activities in Europe and other foreign markets, making it subject to a number of challenges that specifically relate to international business activities. These include:

If we are unable to meet and overcome these challenges, then our international operations may not be successful, which could adversely affect our net sales, results of operations and financial condition and limit our growth.

We may be unable to manage our growth and entry into new business areas.

If the initial response to our exoskeleton products exceeds the Company’s capacity to provide services timely and efficiently, then the Company may need to expand our operations accordingly and swiftly. Management of the Company believes that establishing industry leadership will require the Company to:

To be able to expand our operations in a cost-effective or timely manner and increase the overall market acceptance of our products and services in this manner, we will need additional capital and technical and managerial human resources. These additional resources may not be available to the Company. Failure of the Company to timely and efficiently expand our operations and successfully achieve the four requirements listed above could have a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations and financial condition of the Company.

The disruption or loss of relationships with vendors and suppliers for the components of our products could materially adversely affect our business.

Our ability to manufacture and market our products successfully is dependent on relationships with both third party vendors and suppliers. We rely on various vendors and suppliers for the components of our products and procure these components through purchase orders, with no guaranteed supply arrangements. Certain components are only available from a limited number of suppliers.

Our inability to obtain sufficient quantities of these components, if and as required in the future, may subject us to:

The loss of any significant supplier, in the absence of a timely and satisfactory alternative arrangement, or an inability to obtain essential components on reasonable terms or at all, could materially adversely affect our business, operations and cash flows.

In addition, failure of any one supplier’s components could result in a product recall, which could materially adversely affect our business, operations and cash flows.

New product introductions may adversely impact our financial results.

We may introduce new products with enhanced features and extended capabilities from time to time. The products will be subject to various regulatory processes, and we will need to obtain and maintain regulatory approvals in order to sell our new products. If a potential purchaser believes that we plan to introduce a new product in the near future or if a potential purchaser is located in a country where a new product that we have introduced has not yet received regulatory approval, planned purchases may be deferred or delayed. As a result, new product introductions may adversely impact our financial results.

The acquisition of other companies, businesses, or technologies could result in operating difficulties, dilution, and other harmful consequences.

We may selectively pursue strategic acquisitions, any of which could be material to our business, operating results, and financial condition. Future acquisitions could divert management’s time and focus from operating our business. In addition, integrating an acquired company, business or technology is risky and may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures associated with integrating employees from the acquired company into our organization and integrating each company’s accounting, management information, human resources and other administrative systems to permit effective management. The anticipated benefits of future acquisitions may not materialize. Future acquisitions or dispositions could result in potentially dilutive issuances of our equity securities, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities or amortization expenses, or write-offs of goodwill, any of which could harm our financial condition. Future acquisitions may also require us to obtain additional financing, which may not be available on favorable terms or at all.

The impact of United States healthcare reform legislation remains uncertain.

In 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”) was enacted into law. The legislation seeks to reform the United States healthcare system. It is far-reaching and is intended to expand access to health insurance coverage, improve quality and reduce costs over time. We expect the new law will have a significant impact upon various aspects of our business operations. The PPACA reduces Medicare and Medicaid payments to hospitals, clinical laboratories and pharmaceutical companies, and could otherwise reduce the volume of medical procedures. These factors, in turn, could result in reduced demand for our products and increased downward pricing pressure. It is also possible that the PPACA will result in lower reimbursements. While the PPACA is intended to expand health insurance coverage to uninsured persons in the United States, the impact of any overall increase in access to healthcare on sales of our products remains uncertain. In addition, the new law imposes a 2.3 percent excise tax on medical devices that will apply to United States sales of our medical device product. Many of the details of the new law will be included in new and revised regulations, which have not yet been promulgated, and require additional guidance and specificity to be provided by the Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Labor and Department of the Treasury. Accordingly, while it is too early to understand and predict the ultimate impact of the new law on our business, the legislation and resulting regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flows, financial condition and results of operations.

Healthcare changes in the United States and other countries resulting in pricing pressures could have a negative impact on our future operating results.

In addition to the PPACA, initiatives sponsored by government agencies, legislative bodies and the private sector to limit the growth of healthcare costs, including price regulation and competitive pricing, are ongoing in markets where we will do business. Pricing pressure has also increased in these markets due to continued consolidation among health care providers, trends toward managed care, the shift towards governments becoming the primary payers of health care expenses and laws and regulations relating to reimbursement and pricing generally. Reductions in reimbursement levels or coverage or other cost-containment measures could unfavorably affect our future operating results.

Continuing worldwide macroeconomic instability, such as recent recessions in Europe and the debt crisis in certain countries in the European Union, could negatively affect our ability to conduct business in those geographies.

Since 2008, the global economy has been impacted by the sequential effects of an ongoing global financial crisis which has caused extreme disruption in the financial markets, including severely diminished liquidity and credit availability.  There can be no assurance that further deterioration will not occur.  Our customers and suppliers may experience financial difficulties or be unable to borrow money to fund their operations which may adversely impact their ability to purchase our products or to pay for them on a timely basis, if at all.  Further, the continuing debt crisis in certain European countries could cause the value of the euro to deteriorate, reducing the purchasing power of our European customers. Failure to receive payment of all or a significant portion of our receivables could adversely affect our results of operations.   In addition, financial difficulties experienced by our suppliers could result in product delays and inventory issues.

Natural or other disasters could disrupt our business and result in loss of revenue or in higher expenses.

Natural disasters, terrorist activities, military conflict and other business disruptions could seriously harm our revenue and financial condition and increase our costs and expenses. Our corporate headquarters are located in California, a seismically active region. A natural disaster in any of our major markets in North America or Europe could have a material adverse impact on our operations, operating results and financial condition. Further, any unanticipated business disruption caused by Internet security threats, damage to global communication networks or otherwise could have a material adverse impact on our operating results.

Risks Related to our Financial Condition

We have a history of losses and we may not achieve or sustain profitability in the future.

Ekso Bionics has incurred losses in each fiscal year since its incorporation in 2005. We anticipate that our operating expenses will increase in the foreseeable future as we continue to invest to grow our business, acquire customers and develop our platform and new functionality. These efforts may prove more expensive than we currently anticipate, and we may not succeed in increasing our revenues sufficiently to offset these higher expenses.

We may not be able to reduce the cost to manufacture our products as planned.

Our business plan assumes that exoskeletons can be manufactured more cheaply than they are currently being manufactured. However, we have not yet found a way to significantly reduce the manufacturing cost of our products and doing so may prove more difficult than expected or even impossible. For example, if expectations for greater functionality of the products drive costs up as other factors drive costs down, the result may be that the overall cost of manufacturing the product stays the same or even increases.

Our operating losses and lack of revenues raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. If we do not continue as a going concern, investors could lose their entire investment.

Our historical operating losses and lack of revenues to support our cost structure raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. If we do not generate revenues, do not achieve profitability and do not have other sources of financing for our business, we may have to curtail or cease our development plans and operations, which could cause investors to lose the entire amount of their investment.

If we are unable to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms, we may have to curtail our growth or cease our development plans and operations.

The operation of our business and our growth efforts will require significant cash outlays and advance capital equipment expenditures and commitments. We will be largely dependent on capital raised through the PPO to implement our business plan and support our operations. We believe that the net proceeds of the PPO will be sufficient to fund us for approximately 18 months. Other than the PPO, at the present time, we have not made any arrangements to raise additional cash. We anticipate for the foreseeable future that cash on hand, cash generated from operations, and the amounts available under lines of credit will not be sufficient to meet our cash requirements, and that we will need to raise additional capital through investments to fund our operations and growth. To date Ekso has been able to raise needed capital for its business through equity and debt investment. We cannot assure you that we will be able to raise additional working capital as needed on terms acceptable to us, if at all.  If we are unable to raise capital as needed, we may be required to reduce the scope of our business development activities, which could harm our business plans, financial condition and operating results, or cease our operations entirely, in which case, you may lose all your investment. Financings, if obtained, may be on terms that are dilutive to our stockholders, and the prices at which new investors would be willing to purchase our securities may be lower than the price at which you purchase your shares.

Potential investors should be aware that the value of an investment in the Company may go down as well as up. In addition, there can be no certainty that the market value of an investment in the Company will fully reflect its underlying value.

Our reported financial results may be adversely affected by changes in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States are subject to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Securities and Exchange Commission and various bodies formed to promulgate and interpret appropriate accounting principles. A change in these principles or interpretations could have a significant effect on our reported financial results, and could affect the reporting of transactions completed before the announcement of a change.

Changes in tax laws or exposure to additional income tax liabilities could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to income taxes as well as non-income based taxes, in both the U.S. and various jurisdictions outside the U.S.  We are subject to ongoing tax audits in various jurisdictions.  Tax authorities may disagree with certain positions we have taken and assess additional taxes and penalties. We regularly assess the likely outcomes of these audits in order to determine the appropriateness of our tax provision.  However, there can be no assurance that we will accurately predict the outcomes of these audits, and the actual outcomes of these audits could have a material impact on our consolidated earnings and financial condition.  Additionally, changes in tax laws or tax rulings could materially impact our effective tax rate.  Proposals for fundamental U.S. corporate tax reform, if enacted, could have a material adverse impact on our future results of operations.

Investment Risks

You could lose all of your investment.

An investment in our securities is speculative and involves a high degree of risk. Potential investors should be aware that the value of an investment in the Company may go down as well as up. In addition, there can be no certainty that the market value of an investment in the Company will fully reflect its underlying value. You could lose your entire investment.

You may experience dilution of your ownership interests because of the future issuance of additional shares of our common or preferred stock or other securities that are convertible into or exercisable for our common or preferred stock.

In the future, we may issue our authorized but previously unissued equity securities, resulting in the dilution of the ownership interests of our present stockholders and the purchasers of our Units offered hereby.  The Company will be authorized to issue an aggregate of 500,000,000 shares of Common Stock and 10,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock.   We may issue additional shares of our Common Stock or other securities that are convertible into or exercisable for our Common Stock in connection with hiring or retaining employees, future acquisitions, future sales of our securities for capital raising purposes, or for other business purposes.  The future issuance of any such additional shares of our Common Stock may create downward pressure on the trading price of the Common Stock.  We will need to raise additional capital in the near future to meet our working capital needs, and there can be no assurance that we will not be required to issue additional shares, warrants or other convertible securities in the future in conjunction with these capital raising efforts, including at a price (or exercise prices) below the price you paid for your stock.

The ability of our Board of Directors to issue additional stock may prevent or make more difficult certain transactions, including a sale or merger of the Company.

Our Board of Directors will be authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock with powers, rights and preferences designated by it.  See “Preferred Stock” in the section of this Report titled “Description of Securities.” Shares of voting or convertible preferred stock could be issued, or rights to purchase such shares could be issued, to create voting impediments or to frustrate persons seeking to effect a takeover or otherwise gain control of the Company.  The ability of the Board to issue such additional shares of preferred stock, with rights and preferences it deems advisable, could discourage an attempt by a party to acquire control of the Company by tender offer or other means.  Such issuances could therefore deprive stockholders of benefits that could result from such an attempt, such as the realization of a premium over the market price for their shares in a tender offer or the temporary increase in market price that such an attempt could cause.  Moreover, the issuance of such additional shares of preferred stock to persons friendly to the Board of Directors could make it more difficult to remove incumbent managers and directors from office even if such change were to be favorable to stockholders generally.

There currently is no public market for our Common Stock and there can be no assurance that a public market will ever develop. Failure to develop or maintain a trading market could negatively affect the value of our Common Stock and make it difficult or impossible for you to sell your shares.

There is currently no public market for shares of our Common Stock and one may never develop. Our Common Stock is quoted on the OTC Markets. The OTC Markets is a thinly traded market and lacks the liquidity of certain other public markets with which some investors may have more experience. We may not ever be able to satisfy the listing requirements for our Common Stock to be listed on a national securities exchange, which is often a more widely-traded and liquid market. Some, but not all, of the factors which may delay or prevent the listing of our Common Stock on a more widely-traded and liquid market include the following: our stockholders’ equity may be insufficient; the market value of our outstanding securities may be too low; our net income from operations may be too low; our Common Stock may not be sufficiently widely held; we may not be able to secure market makers for our Common Stock; and we may fail to meet the rules and requirements mandated by the several exchanges and markets to have our Common Stock listed. Should we fail to satisfy the initial listing standards of the national exchanges, or our Common Stock is otherwise rejected for listing, and remains listed on the OTC Markets or is suspended from the OTC Markets, the trading price of our Common Stock could suffer and the trading market for our Common Stock may be less liquid and our Common Stock price may be subject to increased volatility.

Our Common Stock is subject to the “penny stock” rules of the SEC and the trading market in the securities is limited, which makes transactions in the stock cumbersome and may reduce the value of an investment in the stock.

Rule 15g-9 under the Exchange Act establishes the definition of a “penny stock,” for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions.  For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require: (a) that a broker or dealer approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks; and (b) the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.

In order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must: (a) obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the person and (b) make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.

The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form: (a) sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and (b) confirms that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.  Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the “penny stock” rules.  This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of our Common Stock and cause a decline in the market value of our Common Stock.

Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions payable to both the broker or dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions.  Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.

Our stock may be traded infrequently and in low volumes, so you may be unable to sell your shares at or near the quoted bid prices if you need to sell your shares.

Until our Common Stock is listed on a national securities exchange such as the New York Stock Exchange or the Nasdaq Stock Market, we expect our Common Stock to remain eligible for quotation on the OTC Markets, or on another over-the-counter quotation system, or in the “pink sheets.” In those venues, however, the shares of our Common Stock may trade infrequently and in low volumes, meaning that the number of persons interested in purchasing our common shares at or near bid prices at any given time may be relatively small or non-existent. An investor may find it difficult to obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of our Common Stock or to sell his or her shares at or near bid prices or at all. In addition, if we fail to meet the criteria set forth in SEC regulations, various requirements would be imposed by law on broker-dealers who sell our securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors. Consequently, such regulations may deter broker-dealers from recommending or selling our Common Stock, which may further affect the liquidity of our Common Stock. This would also make it more difficult for us to raise capital.

We do not anticipate paying dividends on our Common Stock, and investors may lose the entire amount of their investment.

Cash dividends have never been declared or paid on our Common Stock, and we do not anticipate such a declaration or payment for the foreseeable future. We expect to use future earnings, if any, to fund business growth. Therefore, stockholders will not receive any funds absent a sale of their shares of Common Stock. If we do not pay dividends, our Common Stock may be less valuable because a return on your investment will only occur if our stock price appreciates. We cannot assure stockholders of a positive return on their investment when they sell their shares, nor can we assure that stockholders will not lose the entire amount of their investment.

Being a public company is expensive and administratively burdensome.

As a public reporting company, we are subject to the information and reporting requirements of the Securities Act, the Exchange Act and other federal securities laws, rules and regulations related thereto, including compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Complying with these laws and regulations requires the time and attention of our Board of Directors and management, and increases our expenses. Among other things, we are required to:

The costs of preparing and filing annual and quarterly reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC and furnishing audited reports to stockholders is expensive and much greater than that of a privately-held company, and compliance with these rules and regulations may require us to hire additional financial reporting, internal controls and other finance personnel, and will involve a material increase in regulatory, legal and accounting expenses and the attention of management. There can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the applicable regulations in a timely manner, if at all. In addition, being a public company makes it more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance. In the future, we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain this coverage. These factors could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified executives and members of our Board of Directors, particularly directors willing to serve on an audit committee which we expect to establish.

Any failure to maintain effective internal control over our financial reporting could materially adversely affect us.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires us to include in our annual reports on Form 10-K an assessment by management of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. In addition, at such time, if any, as we are no longer a “smaller reporting company,” our independent registered public accounting firm will have to attest to and report on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of such internal control over financial reporting. Based upon the last evaluation conducted as of September 30, 2013, our management at the time concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of such date to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms. Specifically, our then-management determined that there were control deficiencies that constituted material weaknesses, including our lack of an independent audit committee, including a financial expert member and lack of appropriate cash controls and information technology controls. While our new management as a result of the Merger believes that our control environment is substantially improved, our independent public accountants, in conducting an audit of Ekso Bionics’ financial statements as of September 30, 2013, identified several control deficiencies that they believed constituted a material weakness, individually and in aggregate. Our new management has not yet conducted a new formal evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting and has not been able to make its own assessment on whether the internal controls as of 2012 or 2013 were effective. In addition, we continue at the present time not to have an audit committee.

While we intend to diligently and thoroughly document, review, test and improve our internal control over financial reporting in order to ensure compliance with Section 404, management may not be able to conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is effective. Furthermore, even if management were to reach such a conclusion, if our independent registered public accounting firm is not satisfied with the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, or if the independent auditors interpret the requirements, rules or regulations differently than we do, then they may decline to attest to management’s assessment or may issue a report that is qualified. Any of these events could result in a loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which in turn could negatively affect the price of our Common Stock.

In particular, we must perform system and process evaluation and testing of our internal control over financial reporting to allow management and (if required in future) our independent registered public accounting firm to report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, as required by Section 404. Our compliance with Section 404 may require that we incur substantial accounting expense and expend significant management efforts. We currently do not have an internal audit group, and we will need to retain the services of additional accounting and financial staff or consultants with appropriate public company experience and technical accounting knowledge to satisfy the ongoing requirements of Section 404. We intend to review the effectiveness of our internal controls and procedures and make any changes management determines appropriate, including to achieve compliance with Section 404 by the date on which we are required to so comply.

***

The risks above do not necessarily comprise all of those associated with an investment in the Company. This Report contains forward looking statements that involve unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, financial condition, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, those set out above.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION\

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following management’s discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the historical financial statements and the related notes thereto contained in this Report. The management’s discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements, such as statements of our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Any statements that are not statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. When used, the words “believe,” “plan,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “target,” “estimate,” “expect” and the like, and/or future tense or conditional constructions (“will,” “may,” “could,” “should,” etc.), or similar expressions, identify certain of these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including those under “Risk Factors” in this Form 8-K,that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. The Company’s actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of several factors. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this report.

As a result of the Merger and the change in business and operations of the Company, from engaging in the business of distributing medical supplies and equipment to municipalities, hospitals, pharmacies, care centers, and clinics throughout the country of Chile, to the business of developing and commercializing exoskeletons to augment human strength, endurance and mobility, a discussion of the past financial results of PN Med Group Inc. is not pertinent, and under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States the historical financial results of Ekso Bionics, Inc. (“Ekso Bionics”), the accounting acquirer, prior to the Merger are considered the historical financial results of the Company.

The following discussion highlights Ekso Bionics’ results of operations and the principal factors that have affected its consolidated financial condition as well as its liquidity and capital resources for the periods described, and provides information that management believes is relevant for an assessment and understanding of the Company’s consolidated financial condition and results of operations presented herein. The following discussion and analysis are based on Ekso Bionics’ audited and unaudited financial statements contained in this Report, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. You should read the discussion and analysis together with such financial statements and the related notes thereto.

Basis of Presentation

The audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, and the unaudited consolidated financial statements for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2013, include a summary of our significant accounting policies and should be read in conjunction with the discussion below. In the opinion of management, all material adjustments necessary to present fairly the consolidated results of operations for such periods have been included in these audited consolidated financial statements. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.

Overview

Ekso Bionics has pioneered the field of exoskeletons to augment human strength, endurance and mobility. Ekso Bionics is developing and commercializing wearable robots, or “exoskeletons,” that have a variety of applications in the medical, military, industrial, and consumer markets. The devices are ready to wear, battery-powered bionics that are strapped over the user’s clothing, enabling individuals with neurological conditions affecting gait to walk again; permitting soldiers to carry heavy loads for long distances while mitigating lower back injuries; and allowing industrial workers to perform heavy duty work for extended periods.

Ekso Bionics is currently focusing primarily on medical applications for people with lower extremity weakness or paralysis. Its products have been listed with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and have received a CE Mark (indicating compliance with European Union legislation). Ekso Bionics has sold over 40 units to rehabilitation centers since February 2012. Ekso Bionics also has a collaborative partnership with Lockheed Martin Corporation to develop products for military applications.

Until the February 2012 launch of Ekso Bionics’ first commercial medical exoskeleton, the Company had devoted substantially all of its efforts to product development and raising capital. Accordingly, the Company is considered to be in the early commercialization stage.

Strategy

Ekso Bionics’ long term goal is to have one million persons stand and walk in Ekso^TM exoskeletons by February 2022.

The first step to achieving that goal is for the Company to focus on selling its medical suits to rehabilitation centers and hospitals in the United States and Europe. Ekso Bionics began that effort with the February 2012 sale of Ekso, an exoskeleton for complete spinal cord injuries (“SCI”). The Company has expanded that effort with the launch of its variable assist software and the announcement of its newest hardware platform, Ekso GT^TM. The variable assist software enables users with any amount of lower extremity strength to contribute their own power for either leg to achieve self-initiated walking. The Ekso GT builds on the experience of the Ekso and incorporates the variable assist, allowing the Company to expand its sales and marketing efforts beyond SCI-focused centers to centers supporting stroke and related neurological patients. There are approximately 350 SCI centers in the U.S. providing services for the approximately 12,000 to 14,000 SCI incidences per year. There are approximately 5,700 registered hospitals in the U.S., providing services to the approximately 650,000 annual stroke survivors.

In parallel to the development and early commercialization of medical exoskeletons, Ekso Bionics has been and continues to work on the development of exoskeletons for able-bodied users. In addition to furthering the field of exoskeletons that can lead to the commercialization of exoskeletons outside the Company’s current medical applications, Ekso Bionics’ development work furthers technology that is also potentially applicable for use in future models of the Ekso, including potentially a unit for home use.

Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates, and Judgments

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We continually evaluate our estimates and judgments, our commitments to strategic alliance partners and the timing of the achievement of collaboration milestones. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Materially different results can occur as circumstances change and additional information becomes known. Besides the estimates identified above that are considered critical, we make many other accounting estimates in preparing our financial statements and related disclosures. All estimates, whether or not deemed critical, affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, as well as disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. These estimates and judgments are also based on historical experience and other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Materially different results can occur as circumstances change and additional information becomes known, even for estimates and judgments that are not deemed critical.

Revenue and Cost of Revenue

When collaboration, other research arrangements and product sales include multiple-element revenue arrangements, the Company accounts for these transactions by determining the elements, or deliverables, included in the arrangement and determining which deliverables are separable for accounting purposes. The Company considers delivered items to be separable if the delivered item(s) have stand-alone value to the customer.

The Company recognizes revenue when the four basic criteria of revenue recognition are met:

During 2011, the Company’s revenue was derived principally from collaborative research and development service arrangements, technology license agreements, and government grants. Beginning in 2012, with the commercialization of the Ekso, the Company began to recognize revenue from the sales of the Ekso and related services.

Medical Device Revenue and Cost of Revenue

The Company builds medical devices called the Ekso for sale and capitalizes into inventory materials, direct and indirect labor and overhead in connection with manufacture and assembly of these units.

In a typical Ekso sales arrangement, the Company is obligated to deliver to the customer the Ekso unit and related software (the software is essential to the unit’s functionality), post-sale training, technical support and maintenance. Because of the uniqueness of the Ekso unit and its use, none of these deliverables has standalone value to the customer. Accordingly, once a sales arrangement with a fixed or determinable price and reasonably assured payment is in place, the entire sales price is accounted for as a single unit of accounting. The combined total sales price for the delivered and undelivered elements are deferred and amortized to revenue beginning at the completion of training, which is the last delivered item, on a straight line basis over the maintenance period, usually three years.

Because of the limited guidance about how to account for costs associated with a delivered item that cannot be separated from the undelivered items, the accounting for such costs must be based on the conceptual framework and analogies to the limited guidance that does exists. Accordingly, the Company accounts for the costs of the delivered items following, by analogy, the guidance in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 310-20, Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (“ASC 310-20”). Under this guidance, upon completion of training, the costs capitalized into inventory including direct material, direct and indirect labor, as well as overhead costs are deferred and then amortized to costs of sales on the same basis as deferred revenue. The Company’s inclusion of indirect labor and overhead costs are included in inventory because, under the conceptual framework, they add value to the Ekso unit and are otherwise appropriate inventory costs. Since the Company has an enforceable contract for the remaining deliverables and the entire arrangement is expected to generate positive margins, realization of the capitalized costs is probable and, as such, deferring and amortizing them on the same basis as deferred revenue is appropriate.

At the time of shipment to the customer, the related inventory is reclassified to deferred cost of revenue where it is amortized to cost of revenue over the same period that revenue is recognized. All costs incurred subsequent to the date of shipment are expensed as incurred. The cost of medical device revenue includes expenses associated with the manufacture and delivery of devices including materials, payroll, benefits, subcontractor expenses, depreciation of manufacturing equipment, excess and obsolete inventory costs, and shipping charges.

Engineering Services Revenue and Cost of Revenue

The Company enters into technology license agreements that typically provide for annual minimum access fees. When these annual minimum payments have separate stand-alone values, the Company recognizes revenue when the technology is transferred or accessed, provided that the technology transferred or accessed is not dependent on the outcome of continuing research and/or other development efforts.

Collaborative arrangements typically consist of cost reimbursements for specific research and development spending, and future product royalty payments. Cost reimbursements for research and development spending are recognized as the related project labor hours are incurred in relation to all labor hours and when collectability is reasonably assured. Amounts received in advance are recorded as deferred revenue until the technology is transferred, services are rendered, or milestones are reached. Product royalty payments are recorded when earned under the arrangement.

Government grants, which support the Company’s research efforts in specific projects, generally provide for reimbursement of approved costs as defined in the notices of grant awards. Grant revenue is recognized as the associated project labor hours are incurred in relation to total labor hours. There are some grants, like the National Science Foundation grants, which the Company draws upon and spends based on budgets preapproved by the grantor.

The cost of engineering services revenue includes payroll and benefits, subcontractor expenses and materials. All costs related to engineering services are expensed as incurred and reported as cost of revenue.

Research and Development

Research and development costs consist of costs incurred for the Company’s own internal research and development activities. These costs primarily include salaries and other personnel-related expenses, contractor fees, facility costs, supplies, and depreciation of equipment associated with the design and development of new products prior to the establishment of their technological feasibility. Such costs are expensed as incurred.

Inventories, net

Inventories are recorded at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is principally determined using the average cost method. Parts from vendors are received and recorded as raw material. Once the raw materials are incorporated in the fabrication of the product, the related value of the component is recorded as work in progress (“WIP”). Direct and indirect labor and applicable overhead costs are also allocated and recorded to WIP inventory. Finished goods are comprised of completed products that are ready for customer shipment. Excess and obsolete inventories are written down based on sales and forecasted demand.

Stock-based Compensation

The Company measures stock-based compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees and directors based on the estimated fair value of the award on the date of grant and recognized, less estimated forfeitures, on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Stock-based awards made to non-employees are measured and recognized based on the estimated fair value on the vesting date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and are remeasured at each reporting period.

The Company’s determination of the fair value of stock-based awards on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the Company’s expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors.

The Company has, from time to time, modified the terms of its stock options to employees. The Company accounts for the incremental increase in the fair value over the original award on the date of the modification for vested awards or over the remaining service (vesting) period for unvested awards. The incremental compensation cost is the excess of the fair value based measure of the modified award on the date of modification over the fair value of the original award immediately before the modification.

Convertible Instruments

The Company accounts for hybrid contracts that feature conversion options in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging Activities, (“ASC 815”) requires companies to bifurcate conversion options from their host instruments and account for them as free standing derivative financial instruments according to certain criteria. The criteria includes circumstances in which (a) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative instrument are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract, (b) the hybrid instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative instrument and the host contract is not re-measured at fair value under otherwise applicable generally accepted accounting principles with changes in fair value reported in earnings as they occur and (c) a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative instrument would be considered a derivative instrument.

Conversion options that contain variable settlement features such as provisions to adjust the conversion price upon subsequent issuances of equity or equity linked securities at exercise prices more favorable than that featured in the hybrid contract generally result in their bifurcation from the host instrument.

The Company accounts for convertible instruments when the Company has determined that the embedded conversion options should not be bifurcated from their host instruments, in accordance with ASC 470-20, Debt with Conversion and Other Options (“ASC 470-20”). Under ASC 470-20 the Company records, when necessary, discounts to convertible notes for the intrinsic value of conversion options embedded in debt instruments based upon the differences between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the note transaction and the effective conversion price embedded in the note. The Company accounts for convertible instruments (when the Company has determined that the embedded conversion options should be bifurcated from their host instruments) in accordance with ASC 815.  Under ASC 815, a portion of the proceeds received upon the issuance of the hybrid contract is allocated to the fair value of the derivative. The derivative is subsequently marked to market at each reporting date based on current fair value, with the changes in fair value reported in results of operations.

The Company also follows ASC 480-10, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (“ASC 480-10”) in its evaluation of the accounting for a hybrid instrument. A financial instrument that embodies an unconditional obligation, or a financial instrument other than an outstanding share that embodies a conditional obligation, that the issuer must or may settle by issuing a variable number of its equity shares shall be classified as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances) if, at inception, the monetary value of the obligation is based solely or predominantly on any one of the following: a. a fixed monetary amount known at inception (for example, a payable settleable with a variable number of the issuer’s equity shares); b. variations in something other than the fair value of the issuer’s equity shares (for example, a financial instrument indexed to the Standard and Poor's S&P 500 Index and settleable with a variable number of the issuer’s equity shares); or c. variations inversely related to changes in the fair value of the issuer’s equity shares (for example, a written put option that could be net share settled). Hybrid instruments meeting these criteria are not further evaluated for any embedded derivatives, and are carried as a liability at fair value at each balance sheet date with remeasurements reported in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Warrants Issued in Connection with Financings

The Company generally accounts for warrants issued in connection with debt and equity financings as a component of equity, unless the warrants include a conditional obligation to issue a variable number of shares or there is a deemed possibility that the Company may need to settle the warrants in cash. For warrants issued with a conditional obligation to issue a variable number of shares or the deemed possibility of a cash settlement, the Company records the fair value of the warrants as a liability at each balance sheet date and records changes in fair value in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations.

Results of Operations

Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2013

The following table sets out our consolidated net loss from operations for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 and the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2013:

Detailed discussion and analysis of our consolidated results of operations are as follows:

Revenue

Total consolidated revenue increased by 47% to $2,706,577 for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $1,846,476 for the year ended December 31, 2011. Total consolidated revenue increased by 37% to $2,514,005 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2013 compared to $1,834,760 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2012.

Shipments of our new medical application device, which we call Ekso, commenced in the first quarter of 2012, and continued throughout 2012. Revenue from the sale of Ekso was $566,222 during the year ended December 31, 2012. Revenue was $302,992 during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $1,138,995 during the same period of 2013, an increase of 276%. The increase in the current period compared to the prior period is largely attributable to amortization of deferred revenue from the prior period and the continued ramp up of Ekso sales in 2013.

Revenue from engineering services was $1,846,476 for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $2,140,355 for 2012, representing an increase of 16% over the prior year. The increase is largely attributable to the receipt of more grant and development work. Revenue from engineering services was $1,531,768 during the nine month period ended September 30, 2012 compared to $1,375,010 during the corresponding period in 2013, representing a 10% decrease. The decrease in engineering services revenue the current period compared to the prior period is largely attributable to the redeployment of engineers in 2013 from providing revenue generating government grant services to the production of the Ekso, and the termination of a technology license royalty agreement.

Cost of revenue and gross profit

Cost of medical devices for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 was $0 and $553,429, respectively. The increase in 2012 compared to 2011 is attributable to sales of the Ekso commencing in the first quarter of 2012 and continuing throughout 2012.

Cost of engineering services for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 was $1,319,430 and $1,782,848, respectively, representing an increase of 35% year over year. The increase is largely attributable to the labor and material costs associated with an increase in grant and development work in 2012.

Cost of medical devices for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2013 was $250,056 and $775,007, respectively, representing an increase of 210%. This increase is attributable to an increase in direct material and labor costs associated with the ramp up of production and sales of the Ekso.

Cost of engineering services for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2013 was $1,515,073 and $1,018,801, respectively, representing a decrease of 33%. This decrease is largely attributable to fewer resources devoted to grant and development work in 2013 as the Company redeployed resources to the production of the Ekso.

Gross profit – medical devices for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 was $0 and $12,793, respectively. The increase in 2012 compared to 2011 is attributable to sales of the Ekso commencing in the first quarter of 2012 and continuing throughout 2012. Gross profit – medical devices increased by 588% to $363,988 during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $52,936 for the corresponding nine month period in 2012. The increase in gross profit in the current period compared to the prior period is largely attributable to a decrease in costs associated from our product introduction in 2012 and having a full period of sales during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the corresponding period in 2012, offset in part by a decrease in the average selling price of Ekso.

Gross profit – engineering services decreased by 32% to $357,507 for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $527,046 for the year ended December 31, 2011. The decrease in 2012 compared to 2011 is largely attributable to upfront costs incurred associated with a newly initiated research and development project. Gross profit – engineering services was $16,694 during the nine month period ended September 30, 2012 compared to $356,209 during the same period of 2013, an increase of 2034%. This increase is largely attributable to the timing of third party expenses associated with initiating a research and development project in 2012 and an increase in labor rates for our grant work.

Operating Expenses

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 was $3,823,497 and $4,381,067, respectively, representing an increase of 15%. The increase is largely attributable to increased headcount and higher facility costs as a result of the Company’s move to its new headquarters in 2012 to support the production of the new Ekso.

General and administrative expenses for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2013 was $3,336,628 and $2,854,332, respectively, representing a decrease of 14%. The decrease is largely attributable to a reduction in force in the third quarter of 2013 in order to reduce the Company’s cash burn rate.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 was $3,229,691 and $4,304,317, respectively, an increase of 33%. The increase in 2012 compared to 2011 is largely attributable to a doubling of headcount in 2012 to support enhanced research and development activities associated with the Ekso.

Research and development expenses for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2013 was $3,133,884 and $2,164,840, respectively, representing a decrease of 31%. The decrease in the current period compared to the prior period is largely attributable to adjustments in staffing from a reduction in force in the third quarter of 2013 in order to reduce the Company’s cash burn rate.

Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing expenses for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 was $2,791,150 and $5,925,905, respectively, representing an increase of 112%. The increase in 2012 compared to 2011 is largely attributable to costs associated with expanding our sales and marketing effort through hiring a direct sales force in the U.S. and Europe to support sales of the Ekso.

Sales and marketing expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2013 was $4,065,981 and $3,238,834, respectively, representing a decrease of 20%. The decrease in the current period compared to the prior period is largely attributable to reductions in staffing, largely in marketing, and other marketing related expenses as a result of a reduction in force in order to reduce our cash burn rate.

Other Income/(Expense)

Other income/(expense) comprise primarily interest income, interest expense and non-cash gains/losses due to changes in the fair value of warrant liabilities.  Other income/(expense), net, for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 was $(110,380) and $(800,969), respectively, an increase of (626%) in other income/(expense), net. The increase in other income/(expense), net in 2012 compared to 2011 is largely attributable to interest expense on the $3.5 million loan entered into in 2012 and the amortization of the related discount, plus a full year of interest expense on debt and warrant liability incurred during 2011.

Other income/(expense), net, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2013 was $(376,228) and $(1,552,825), respectively, an increase of (313%) in other income/(expense), net. The increase in other income/(expense), net in the current period compared to the prior period is largely attributable to a full period of interest and amortization of the discount on the $3.5 million loan we entered into in 2012, and interest on a bridge loan entered into in 2013.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since its inception, the Company has devoted substantially all of its efforts toward the development of exoskeletons for the medical, military and industrial markets and, more recently, toward the commercialization of its medical exoskeletons to rehabilitation centers; and toward raising capital. Accordingly, the Company is considered to be in the early commercialization stage. Since its inception, the Company has financed its operations primarily through the issuance and sale of equity securities for cash consideration and convertible and promissory notes, as well as from government research grant awards and strategic collaboration payments.

Cash and Working Capital

Since inception, the Company has incurred recurring net losses and negative cash flows from operations. As of September 30, 2013, the Company had a working capital deficit of $4.4 million, an accumulated deficit of $35.2 million and a stockholders’ deficit of $33.7 million. The Company has incurred net losses of $9.4 million and $15.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively, and $10.8 million and $9.1 million during the nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2012, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since inception, the Company has satisfied its operating cash requirements from proceeds associated with non-recurring engineering and development projects and from grants. More recently, beginning in December 2010, the Company financed its operations primarily from the private placements of preferred stock and convertible debt sold principally to outside investors.

The Company sold approximately $8.0 million of preferred stock to outside investors between December 2010 and June 2011, and approximately $9.0 million of preferred stock to outside investors between December 2011 and March 2012. Between May 2013 and August 2013, the Company sold approximately $10.8 million of preferred stock with warrants to purchase common stock. In November 2013, the Company secured $5.0 million through the issuance of convertible bridge notes, which were subsequently converted into common stock and common stock warrants in the Company’s January 2014 PPO. The Company believes that the Merger will provide additional opportunities to issue securities and raise capital in the future.

Management believes that the Company’s cash resources as of December 31, 2012, along with the bridge note proceeds received in November 2013 of $5 million and the PPO proceeds of $15.6 million (net of the conversion of the bridge loan), are sufficient to implement the business plan, support operations and meet current obligations through the middle of 2015.

Immediately after the closing of the Merger and private placement discussed above on January 15, 2014, the Company had approximately $11.0 million in cash, after payment of transaction-related expenses of approximately $2.3 million and the repayment in full of its $2.5 million senior note payable from the proceeds of the offering. During the next two years, the Company expects to spend approximately $9.0 million on sales and marketing expenses (including regulatory, clinical and related expenses). With these expenditures, the Company anticipates an increase in its product sales to rehabilitation hospital customers. The Company expects to also incur approximately $10.0 million in general and administrative costs to support the Company’s ongoing research and development expenses and in general administrative costs.

Management believes the Company will have sufficient capital to fund its research and development and related general and administrative expenses for at least the next 18 months of operations under its current business plan. There can be no assurance that financing will be available when required in sufficient amounts, on acceptable terms or at all. In the event that the necessary additional financing is not obtained, we may have to reduce our discretionary overhead costs substantially, including research and development, general and administrative and sales and marketing expenses or otherwise curtail operations.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The following table summarizes the cash for the periods stated. The Company held no cash equivalents for any of the periods presented.

Net Cash Used in Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $7,912,316 and $12,663,145 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively. Cash used in both periods was attributable primarily to net losses after adjustment for certain non-cash items, including but not limited to depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation, adjustments to record convertible debt to fair value and gains/losses due to changes in the fair value of the warrant liabilities.

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was primarily related to equipment purchases as well as net payments for security deposits and notes receivables from stockholders during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 and was $543,559 and $864,838, respectively, and was $849,762 and $49,627 for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively.

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $6.8 million and $14.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively, and was primarily the result of proceeds received from the issuance of convertible preferred stock, the issuance of convertible notes and notes payable offset by payments of principal on the notes payable. Net cash provided by financing activities was $11.8 million and $5.3 million in the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively, primarily as a result of the Company’s issuance of convertible preferred stock and convertible notes offset by principal payments on the notes payable.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

In the table below, we set forth our enforceable and legally binding obligations and future commitments, as well as obligations related to all contracts that we are likely to continue, regardless of the fact that they were cancelable as of December 31, 2012. Some of the figures that we include in this table are based on management’s estimates and assumptions about these obligations, including their duration, the possibility of renewal, anticipated actions by third parties, and other factors. Because these estimates and assumptions are necessarily subjective, the obligations we will actually pay in future periods may vary from those reflected in the table.

(1) The senior note payable was repaid in full on January 15, 2014.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company did not engage in any “off-balance sheet arrangements” (as that term is defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K) as of September 30, 2013.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission rules, shares of our Common Stock which may be acquired upon exercise of stock options or warrants which are currently exercisable or which become exercisable within 60 days of the date of the applicable table below are deemed beneficially owned by the holders of such options and warrants and are deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of such person, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of any other person. Subject to community property laws, where applicable, the persons or entities named in the tables below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our Common Stock indicated as beneficially owned by them.

Pre-Merger

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock as of January 14, 2014, prior to the Merger, by (i) each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our Common Stock (our only classes of voting securities), (ii) each of our directors and executive officers, and (iii) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, the persons named in the table below had sole voting and investment power with respect to the number of shares indicated as beneficially owned by them.

Post-Merger

The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock as of January 16, 2014, after the Merger, by (i) each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our Common Stock (our only classes of voting securities), (ii) each of our directors and executive officers, and (iii) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. To the best of our knowledge, except as otherwise indicated, each of the persons named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of our Common Stock beneficially owned by such person, except to the extent such power may be shared with a spouse. To our knowledge, none of the shares listed below are held under a voting trust or similar agreement, except as noted. Other than the Merger, to our knowledge, there is no arrangement, including any pledge by any person of securities of the Company or any of its parents, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the Company.

Unless otherwise indicated in the following table, the address for each person named in the table is c/o Ekso Bionics Holdings, Inc., 1414 Harbour Way South, Suite 1201, Richmond, California 94804, USA.

* Less than 1%

Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons

Directors and Executive Officers

Below are the names of and certain information regarding the Company’s current executive officers and directors who were appointed effective as of the closing of the Merger:

Directors are elected to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified. Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the annual meeting of stockholders and hold office until the expiration of the term for which he or she was elected and until a successor has been elected and qualified.

A majority of the authorized number of directors constitutes a quorum of the Board of Directors for the transaction of business. The directors must be present at the meeting to constitute a quorum. However, any action required or permitted to be taken by the Board of Directors may be taken without a meeting if all members of the Board of Directors individually or collectively consent in writing to the action.

Executive officers are appointed by the Board of Directors and serve at its pleasure.

The principal occupation and business experience during the past five years for our executive officers and directors is as follows:

Directors

Steven Sherman – Director and Chairman of the Board of Directors

Mr. Sherman has served on the Board of Directors of Ekso Bionics since December 2013. Since 1988, Mr. Sherman has been a member of Sherman Capital Group, a Merchant Banking organization with a portfolio of private and public investments. In addition to Ekso Bionics, Mr. Sherman is currently Chairman of Purple Wave Inc. Mr. Sherman is a founder of Novatel Wireless, Inc., Vodavi Communications Systems Inc. and Main Street and Main Inc. Previously, Mr. Sherman has served as a director of Telit; Chairman of Airlink Communications, Inc. until its sale to Sierra Wireless, Inc.; Chairman of Executone Information Systems; and as a director of Inter-Tel (Delaware) Incorporated.

Nathan Harding – Director and Chief Executive Officer

Mr. Harding is the co-founder of Ekso Bionics and has served as the Chief Executive Officer since November 2012. From 2005 to 2012, Mr. Harding served in various positions including Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, and Chief Project Officer.  He is also a co-inventor of the company's core exoskeleton technology. Prior to his work at Ekso Bionics, Mr. Harding worked as a Mechanical Engineer at Carnegie Mellon's Field Robotics Center from 1989 to 1990, and Redzone Robotics in 1991. He served in various roles including Mechanical Engineering Manager at Berkeley Process Control from 1994 to 2003, and served as a consultant to the Berkeley Robotics and Human Engineering Laboratory from October 2003 until co-founding Ekso Bionics in 2005. Mr. Harding holds ten U.S. patents and has another eight pending. Mr. Harding received his bachelor's degree in Mechanical Engineering and Economics from Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh and his master's in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California, Berkeley.

Dan Boren – Director

Mr. Boren has served on the Board of Directors of Ekso Bionics since April 2013. Since January 2013, Mr. Boren has served as the President of Corporate Development for the Chickasaw Nation. Prior to that role, Mr. Boren served as the elected representative of Oklahoma's 2nd Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives from 2005 through 2013. Before his election to the U.S. House of Representatives, Mr. Boren was elected to the Oklahoma House of Representatives from 2002 to 2004. Mr. Boren earned his B.S. in Economics at Texas Christian University and went on to obtain an M.B.A. at University of Oklahoma.

Marilyn Hamilton – Director

Ms. Hamilton has served on the Board of Directors of Ekso Bionics since January 2012.  In 2009, Ms. Hamilton founded StimDesigns LLC, an early stage neurotechnology company where she has served as CEO from 2009 to present.  In 2007, Ms. Hamilton launched Envision, a professional speaking and business consulting company, and has served as its CEO from 2007 to present. Prior to launching Envision, Ms. Hamilton co-founded Motion Designs Inc. in 1979, a manufacturing and marketing company pioneering innovating custom, ultra-lightweight Quickie wheelchairs where she served in various leadership positions until it was sold ultimately to Sunrise Medical Inc., where Ms. Hamilton served as Global VP. In 1990 Ms. Hamilton founded Winners on Wheels, a coed-scouting program for children in wheelchair; in 2003 she co-founded Discovery through Design, raising awareness and funds for spinal cord injury research and paralyzed women's health; and for 9 years she served as a founding board member and current emeritus board member of The California Endowment, charged with expanding access to affordable, quality healthcare for underserved populations and to promote improvements in the health status of all Californians.  Ms. Hamilton is currently an advisory board member of the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research at the National Institute of Health and has been a member of The Committee of 200 business women since 1993 whose mission is to foster, celebrate and advance women's leadership in private and public companies.

Jack Peurach – Director

Mr. Peurach has served on the Board of Directors of Ekso Bionics since January 2012. Mr. Peurach is the Executive Vice President for SunPower Corp (NASDAQ: SPWR), where he is responsible for all aspects of SunPower’s PV modules and residential, commercial and utility PV systems. Prior to this role, Mr. Peurach led the research and development efforts of the PV Cells, Modules and Systems, and the Advanced Product Development groups at SunPower. Prior to SunPower’s acquisition of PowerLight, Mr. Peurach served as PowerLight’s vice president of product development. Earlier in his career, Mr. Peurach was a strategy consultant for Mercer Management Consulting and director of engineering at Berkeley Process Control, Inc. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University, a Master of Science degree in mechanical engineering from the University of California, Berkeley, and a Master of Business administration, finance and entrepreneurship from the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.

Executive Officers

Russ Angold – Chief Technology Officer

Mr. Angold is the Co-Founder and has served as the Chief Technology Officer of Ekso Bionics since December 2011. From the founding of Ekso Bionics until December 2011, Mr. Angold served as Vice President of Engineering. Prior to joining Ekso Bionics, Mr. Angold held various engineering positions at Rain Bird Corporation, Berkeley Process Control and the Irrigation Training and Research Center in San Luis Obispo, California. Mr. Angold is also the Founding President and Chairman of the Bridging Bionics Foundation. Mr. Angold is a registered Professional Mechanical Engineer and holds a bachelor’s degree in BioResource and Agricultural Engineering from California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo.

Frank Moreman – Chief Operating Officer

Mr. Moreman has served as the Chief Operating Officer since November 2012. Previously, Mr. Moreman served as our Vice President of Manufacturing from July 2011 until November 2012. From January 2010 until joining Ekso Bionics,  Mr. Moreman was an independent consultant, helping Silicon Valley companies in the areas of management development and manufacturing capabilities. From August 2008 until January 2010, Mr. Moreman was the Division Vice President for Sanmina-SCI's Semiconductor and Industrial Division, with manufacturing plants throughout the United States and China. From October 2002 until being acquired by Ultra Clean Technology in July 2006, Mr. Moreman was Chief Operating Officer and Owner of Sieger Engineering, a contract manufacturer serving the semiconductor and medical equipment markets.  Following the acquisition, Mr. Moreman remained with Ultra Clean as Vice President of Materials, Quality, and IT until leaving to join Sanmina in 2008. Mr. Moreman received his BS in Mechanical Engineering from the United States Naval Academy.

Max Scheder-Bieschin – Chief Financial Officer

Mr. Scheder-Bieschin joined Ekso Bionics in January 2011 as its Chief Financial Officer. From November 2009 until he joined Ekso Bionics, Mr. Scheder-Bieschin was an independent consultant for a number of emerging technology companies, including Ekso Bionics. From March 2007 to October 2009, he was co-founder and CEO of Barefoot Motors, a designer and manufacturer of electric all-terrain vehicles. From October 2005 to February 2007, Mr. Scheder-Bieschin served as President of ZAP, a publicly-traded distributor of electric vehicles. From August 1997 to March 2004, Mr. Scheder-Bieschin lived in Frankfurt, serving in senior investment banking roles for BHF-Bank, ING Barings and Deutsche Bank. Mr. Scheder-Bieschin received his BA in economics from Stanford University. He attended New York University and Stanford University’s Executive Program.

Director Independence

We are not currently subject to listing requirements of any national securities exchange or inter-dealer quotation system which has requirements that a majority of the board of directors be “independent” and, as a result, we are not at this time required to have our Board of Directors comprised of a majority of “independent directors.” Nevertheless, our Board has determined that Messrs. Sherman, Boren and Peurach and Ms. Hamilton are independent directors under the applicable standards of the SEC and the Nasdaq stock market.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among our Directors or executive officers.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

None of our directors or executive officers has been involved in any of the following events during the past ten years:

Board Committees

The Company currently has not established any committees of the Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors may designate from among its members an executive committee and one or more other committees in the future. We do not have a nominating committee or a nominating committee charter. Further, we do not have a policy with regard to the consideration of any director candidates recommended by security holders. To date, other than as described above, no security holders have made any such recommendations. The entire Board of Directors performs all functions that would otherwise be performed by committees. Given the present size of our board it is not practical for us to have committees. If we are able to grow our business and increase our operations, we intend to expand the size of our board and allocate responsibilities accordingly.

Audit Committee Financial Expert

We have no separate audit committee at this time. The entire Board of Directors oversees our audits and auditing procedures. The Board of Directors has at this time not determined whether any director is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of Item 407(d)(5) for SEC regulation S-K.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

We have no separate compensation committee at this time. No executive officer of the Company has served as a director or member of the compensation committee (or other committee serving an equivalent function) of any other entity, one of whose executive officers served as director of the Company during 2013.

Director Nomination Agreement

Prior to the consummation of the Merger, the Company entered into a director nomination agreement with Ekso Bionics’ largest shareholder, CNI Commercial LLC (“CNI”). See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information concerning the total compensation paid or accrued by us and by Ekso Bionics during the last two fiscal years indicated to (i) all individuals that served as our or Ekso Bionics’ principal executive officer or acted in a similar capacity for us or Ekso Bionics at any time during the most recent fiscal year indicated; (ii) the two most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers of us or Ekso Bionics at the end of the most recent fiscal year indicated; and (iii) up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided pursuant to clause (ii) above but for the fact that the individual was not serving as an executive officer of us or Ekso Bionics at the end of the most recent fiscal year indicated.

We have no plans in place and have never maintained any plans that provide for the payment of retirement benefits or benefits that will be paid primarily following retirement including, but not limited to, tax qualified deferred benefit plans, supplemental executive retirement plans, tax-qualified deferred contribution plans and nonqualified deferred contribution plans, except that the Company maintains a 401(k) plan in which all eligible employees may participate by making elective deferral contributions to the plan. The Company does not make any matching contributions to the plan.

Except as indicated below, we have no contracts, agreements, plans or arrangements, whether written or unwritten, that provide for payments to the named executive officers listed above.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

We have one compensation plan approved by our stockholders, the 2014 Plan. As of the end of our last completed fiscal year, we had not granted any awards under the 2014 Plan. In connection with the Merger, options to purchase 4,978,645 shares of Ekso Bionics common stock were converted into options to purchase 7,586,459 shares of our Common Stock. See “Description of Securities—Options” below for more information.

The following table sets forth certain information concerning stock options held by the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2013.  

Employment Agreements

Nathan Harding, Chief Executive Officer and President.  On January 15, 2014, in connection with the Merger, we entered into a two-year employment agreement with Mr. Harding.  After the initial two-year term, the agreement shall be automatically renewed for successive one year periods unless terminated by a party on at least 30 days written notice prior to the end of the then-current term. Mr. Harding’s annual base salary is $275,000 and is subject to increase as determined by our Board of Directors. Mr. Harding is eligible, at the discretion of our Board of Directors, to receive an annual bonus of up to 50% of his annual base salary based on us achieving certain operational, financial or other milestones (the “Milestones”) established by our Board of Directors in consultation with Mr. Harding. All or any portion of any such annual bonus may be paid in cash, securities or other property. Mr. Harding is entitled to receive perquisites and other fringe benefits that may be provided to, and is eligible to participate in any other bonus or incentive program established by us, for our executives. Mr. Harding and his dependents are also entitled to participate in any of our employee benefit plans subject to the same terms and conditions applicable to other employees. Mr. Harding will be entitled to be reimbursed for all reasonable travel, entertainment and other expenses incurred or paid by him in connection with, or related to, the performance of his duties, responsibilities or services under his employment agreement, in accordance with policies and procedures, and subject to limitations, adopted by us from time to time. In connection with the Merger, we granted to Mr. Harding options to purchase 900,000 shares of our common stock, exercisable at a price of $1.00 per share, under our 2014 Plan. The options will become exercisable over a 4-year period, with 1/4 of the shares becoming exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of grant and with 1/48 of the shares becoming exercisable at the end of each month thereafter, and subject to Change of Control (as defined in his employment agreement), provided that Mr. Harding is employed by us or any of our subsidiaries on each vesting date.

In the event that Mr. Harding is terminated by us without Cause (as defined in his employment agreement) or he resigns for Good Reason (as defined in his employment agreement) during the term of his employment, Mr. Harding would be entitled to (x) an amount equal to his annual base salary then in effect (payable in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll practices) for a period of 12 months commencing on the effective date of his termination (the “Severance Period”), plus any accrued but unused vacation, and (y) if and to the extent the Milestones are achieved for the annual bonus for the year in which the Severance Period commences (or, in the absence of Milestones, our Board of Directors has, in its sole discretion, otherwise determined an amount of Mr. Harding’s annual bonus for such year), an amount equal to such annual bonus pro-rated for the portion of the performance year completed before Mr. Harding’s employment terminated, (z) any of his stock options, restricted stock or similar incentive equity instruments, including the option grant summarized above, that would first have become vested or exercisable during the Severance Period if Mr. Harding continued to be employed by the Company. For the duration of the Severance Period, Mr. Harding will also be eligible to participate in our group health plan on the same terms applicable to similarly situated active employees during the Severance Period, provided Mr. Harding was participating in such plan immediately prior to the date of employment termination, and each other benefit program to the extent permitted under the terms of such program (collectively, the “Termination Benefits”). If Mr. Harding’s employment is terminated during the term by us for Cause, by Mr. Harding for any reason other than Good Reason or due to his death, then he will not be entitled to receive the Termination Benefits, and shall only be entitled to the compensation and benefits which shall have accrued as of the date of such termination (other than with respect to certain benefits that may be available to Mr. Harding as a result of a “disability” (as defined in his employment agreement).

Russ Angold, Chief Technology Officer.  On January 15, 2014, in connection with the Merger, we entered into a two-year employment agreement with Mr. Angold. After the initial two-year term, the agreement shall be automatically renewed for successive one year periods unless terminated by a party on at least 30 days written notice prior to the end of the then-current term. Mr. Angold’s annual base salary is $225,000 and is subject to increase as determined by our Board of Directors. Mr. Angold is eligible to receive an annual cash bonus of up to 30% of his annual base salary, with such amount to be determined by our Chief Executive Officer or Board of Directors in their respective discretion. All or any portion of Mr. Angold’s annual bonus maybe be based on us achieving the Milestones established by our Chief Executive Officer or Board of Directors in consultation with Mr. Angold. All or any portion of any the annual bonus may be paid in cash, securities or other property. Mr. Angold is entitled to receive perquisites and other fringe benefits that may be provided to, and is eligible to participate in any other bonus or incentive program established by us, for our executives. Mr. Angold and his dependents are also entitled to participate in any of our employee benefit plans subject to the same terms and conditions applicable to other employees. Mr. Angold will be entitled to be reimbursed for all reasonable travel, entertainment and other expenses incurred or paid by him in connection with, or related to, the performance of his duties, responsibilities or services under his employment agreement, in accordance with policies and procedures, and subject to limitations, adopted by us from time to time. In connection with the Merger, we granted to Mr. Angold options to purchase 300,000 shares of our common stock, exercisable at a price of $1.00 per share, under our 2014 Plan. The options will become exercisable over a 4-year period, with 1/4 of the shares becoming exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of grant and with 1/48 of the shares becoming exercisable at the end of each month thereafter, and subject to Change of Control (as defined in his employment agreement), provided that Mr. Angold is employed by us or any of our subsidiaries on each vesting date.

In the event that Mr. Angold is terminated by us without Cause (as defined in his employment agreement) or he resigns for Good Reason (as defined in his employment agreement) during the term of his employment, Mr. Angold would be entitled to (x) an amount equal to his annual base salary then in effect (payable in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll practices) for a period of 12 months commencing on the effective date of his termination (the “Severance Period”), plus any accrued but unused vacation, and (y) if and to the extent the Milestones are achieved for the annual bonus for the year in which the Severance Period commences (or, in the absence of Milestones, our Board of Directors has, in its sole discretion, otherwise determined an amount of Mr. Angold’s annual bonus for such year), an amount equal to such annual bonus pro-rated for the portion of the performance year completed before Mr. Angold’s employment terminated, (z) any of his stock options, restricted stock or similar incentive equity instruments, including the option grant summarized above, that would first have become vested or exercisable during the Severance Period if Mr. Angold continued to be employed by the Company. For the duration of the Severance Period, Mr. Angold will also be eligible to participate in our group health plan on the same terms applicable to similarly situated active employees during the Severance Period, provided Mr. Angold was participating in such plan immediately prior to the date of employment termination, and each other benefit program to the extent permitted under the terms of such program (collectively, the “Termination Benefits”). If Mr. Angold’s employment is terminated during the term by us for Cause, by Mr. Angold for any reason other than Good Reason or due to his death, then he will not be entitled to receive the Termination Benefits, and shall only be entitled to the compensation and benefits which shall have accrued as of the date of such termination (other than with respect to certain benefits that may be available to Mr. Angold as a result of a “disability” (as defined in his employment agreement)).

Frank Moreman, Chief Operating Officer.  On January 15, 2014, in connection with the Merger, we entered into a two-year employment agreement with Mr. Moreman. After the initial two-year term, the agreement shall be automatically renewed for successive one year periods unless terminated by a party on at least 30 days written notice prior to the end of the then-current term. Mr. Moreman’s annual base salary is $225,000 and is subject to increase as determined by our Board of Directors. Mr. Moreman is eligible to receive an annual cash bonus of up to 30% of his annual base salary, with such amount to be determined by our Chief Executive Officer or Board of Directors in their respective discretion. All or any portion of Mr. Moreman’s annual bonus maybe be based on us achieving the Milestones established by our Chief Executive Officer or Board of Directors in consultation with Mr. Moreman. All or any portion of any the annual bonus may be paid in cash, securities or other property. Mr. Moreman is entitled to receive perquisites and other fringe benefits that may be provided to, and is eligible to participate in any other bonus or incentive program established by us, for our executives. Mr. Moreman and his dependents are also entitled to participate in any of our employee benefit plans subject to the same terms and conditions applicable to other employees. Mr. Moreman will be entitled to be reimbursed for all reasonable travel, entertainment and other expenses incurred or paid by him in connection with, or related to, the performance of his duties, responsibilities or services under his employment agreement, in accordance with policies and procedures, and subject to limitations, adopted by us from time to time. In connection with the Merger, we granted to Mr. Moreman options to purchase 350,000 shares of our common stock, exercisable at a price of $1.00 per share, under our 2014 Plan. The options will become exercisable over a 4-year period, with 1/4 of the shares becoming exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of grant and with 1/48 of the shares becoming exercisable at the end of each month thereafter, and subject to Change of Control (as defined in his employment agreement), provided that Mr. Moreman is employed by us or any of our subsidiaries on each vesting date.

In the event that Mr. Moreman is terminated by us without Cause (as defined in his employment agreement) or he resigns for Good Reason (as defined in his employment agreement) during the term of his employment, Mr. Moreman would be entitled to (x) an amount equal to his annual base salary then in effect (payable in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll practices) for a period of 12 months commencing on the effective date of his termination (the “Severance Period”), plus any accrued but unused vacation, and (y) if and to the extent the Milestones are achieved for the annual bonus for the year in which the Severance Period commences (or, in the absence of Milestones, our Board of Directors has, in its sole discretion, otherwise determined an amount of Mr. Moreman’s annual bonus for such year), an amount equal to such annual bonus pro-rated for the portion of the performance year completed before Mr. Moreman’s employment terminated, (z) any of his stock options, restricted stock or similar incentive equity instruments, including the option grant summarized above, that would first have become vested or exercisable during the Severance Period if Mr. Moreman continued to be employed by the Company. For the duration of the Severance Period, Mr. Moreman will also be eligible to participate in our group health plan on the same terms applicable to similarly situated active employees during the Severance Period, provided Mr. Moreman was participating in such plan immediately prior to the date of employment termination, and each other benefit program to the extent permitted under the terms of such program (collectively, the “Termination Benefits”). If Mr. Moreman’s employment is terminated during the term by us for Cause, by Mr. Moreman for any reason other than Good Reason or due to his death, then he will not be entitled to receive the Termination Benefits, and shall only be entitled to the compensation and benefits which shall have accrued as of the date of such termination (other than with respect to certain benefits that may be available to Mr. Moreman as a result of a “disability” (as defined in his employment agreement).

Max Scheder-Bieschin, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary.  On January 15, 2014, in connection with the Merger, we entered into a two-year employment agreement with Mr. Scheder-Bieschin. After the initial two-year term, the agreement shall be automatically renewed for successive one year periods unless terminated by a party on at least 30 days written notice prior to the end of the then-current term. Mr. Scheder-Bieschin’s annual base salary is $225,000 and is subject to increase as determined by our Board of Directors. Mr. Scheder-Bieschin is eligible to receive an annual cash bonus of up to 30% of his annual base salary, with such amount to be determined by our Chief Executive Officer or Board of Directors in their respective discretion. All or any portion of Mr. Scheder-Bieschin’s annual bonus maybe be based on us achieving the Milestones established by our Chief Executive Officer or Board of Directors in consultation with Mr. Scheder-Bieschin. All or any portion of any the annual bonus may be paid in cash, securities or other property. Mr. Scheder-Bieschin is entitled to receive perquisites and other fringe benefits that may be provided to, and is eligible to participate in any other bonus or incentive program established by us, for our executives. Mr. Scheder-Bieschin and his dependents are also entitled to participate in any of our employee benefit plans subject to the same terms and conditions applicable to other employees. Mr. Scheder-Bieschin will be entitled to be reimbursed for all reasonable travel, entertainment and other expenses incurred or paid by him in connection with, or related to, the performance of his duties, responsibilities or services under his employment agreement, in accordance with policies and procedures, and subject to limitations, adopted by us from time to time. In connection with the Merger, we granted to Mr. Scheder-Bieschin options to purchase 300,000 shares of our common stock, exercisable at a price of $1.00 per share, under our 2014 Plan. The options will become exercisable over a 4-year period, with 1/4 of the shares becoming exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of grant and with 1/48 of the shares becoming exercisable at the end of each month thereafter, and subject to Change of Control (as defined in his employment agreement), provided that Mr. Scheder-Bieschin is employed by us or any of our subsidiaries on each vesting date.

In the event that Mr. Scheder-Bieschin is terminated by us without Cause (as defined in his employment agreement) or he resigns for Good Reason (as defined in his employment agreement) during the term of his employment, Mr. Scheder-Bieschin would be entitled to (x) an amount equal to his annual base salary then in effect (payable in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll practices) for a period of 12 months commencing on the effective date of his termination (the “Severance Period”), plus any accrued but unused vacation, and (y) if and to the extent the Milestones are achieved for the annual bonus for the year in which the Severance Period commences (or, in the absence of Milestones, our Board of Directors has, in its sole discretion, otherwise determined an amount of Mr. Scheder-Bieschin’s annual bonus for such year), an amount equal to such annual bonus pro-rated for the portion of the performance year completed before Mr. Scheder-Bieschin’s employment terminated, (z) any of his stock options, restricted stock or similar incentive equity instruments, including the option grant summarized above, that would first have become vested or exercisable during the Severance Period if Mr. Scheder-Bieschin continued to be employed by the Company. For the duration of the Severance Period, Mr. Scheder-Bieschin will also be eligible to participate in our group health plan on the same terms applicable to similarly situated active employees during the Severance Period, provided Mr. Scheder-Bieschin was participating in such plan immediately prior to the date of employment termination, and each other benefit program to the extent permitted under the terms of such program (collectively, the “Termination Benefits”). If Mr. Scheder-Bieschin’s employment is terminated during the term by us for Cause, by Mr. Scheder-Bieschin for any reason other than Good Reason or due to his death, then he will not be entitled to receive the Termination Benefits, and shall only be entitled to the compensation and benefits which shall have accrued as of the date of such termination (other than with respect to certain benefits that may be available to Mr. Scheder-Bieschin as a result of a “disability” (as defined in his employment agreement).

Director Compensation

Non-employee directors’ compensation generally is determined and awarded by the Board. The Board is responsible for, among other things, reviewing, evaluating and designing a director compensation package of a reasonable total value, typically based on comparisons with similar firms, and aligned with long-term interests of the stockholders of the Company, and reviewing director compensation levels and practices and considering, from time to time, changes in such compensation levels and practices. These matters also include making equity awards to non-employee directors from time to time under the Company’s equity-based plans. As part of these responsibilities, the Board may request that management of the Company provide it with recommendations on non-employee director compensation and/or common director compensation practices, although the Board retains its ultimate authority to take compensatory actions.

The Company currently pays its non-employee directors an annual retainer of $10,000. In addition, the Company will pay each member of a standing Board committee, once they are established, an annual retainer of $5,000 per committee, except that the chairperson of the Audit Committee shall be paid an annual retainer of $30,000 and the chairperson of the Compensation Committee shall be paid an annual retainer of $10,000. In addition, the Company pays the Chairman of the Board an additional cash retainer of $5,000 per month.

The Company also grants to each new director (not including those directors who were previously serving on the board of directors of Ekso Bionics) an option to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.

In connection with the Merger, Steven Sherman was elected Chairman of the Board and granted an option to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Also in connection with the Merger, Marilyn Hamilton, Dan Boren and Jack Peurach, were each granted an option to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Each of the option awards were made under our 2014 Plan, have an exercise price of $1.00 per share and will become exercisable over a 4-year period, with 1/4 of the shares becoming exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of grant and with 1/48 of the shares becoming exercisable at the end of each month thereafter.

The following table sets forth compensation actually paid to or earned or accrued by Ekso Bionics’ directors during 2013:

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

SEC rules require us to disclose any transaction or currently proposed transaction in which the Company is a participant and in which any related person has or will have a direct or indirect material interest involving the lesser of $120,000 or one percent (1%) of the average of the Company’s total assets as of the end of last two completed fiscal years. A related person is any executive officer, director, nominee for director, or holder of 5% or more of the Company’s Common Stock, or an immediate family member of any of those persons.

The descriptions set forth above under the captions “The Merger and Related Transactions—Merger Agreement,” “—Split-Off,” “—the PPO,” “—Registration Rights,” “—2013 Equity Incentive Plan,” “—Lock-up Agreements and Other Restrictions” and “Executive Compensation—Employment Agreements” and “—Director Compensation” and below under “Description of Securities—Options” are incorporated herein by reference.

In November 2012, Ekso Bionics entered a convertible bridge note agreement with CNI Commercial LLC (“CNI”) pursuant to which Ekso Bionics issued CNI a convertible bridge note in the aggregate original principal amount of $3,190,000 in anticipation of closing a Series B convertible preferred stock financing in early 2013 (the “2012 CNI Bridge Note”). In March 2013, Ekso Bionics issued an additional convertible bridge note to CNI in the aggregate original principal amount of $1,000,000 (the “2013 CNI Bridge Note”, and collectively, the “CNI Bridge Notes”). The 2012 CNI Bridge Note carried interest at a rate of 5% per annum with a maturity date of November 12, 2013. The 2013 CNI Bridge Note had identical terms to the 2012 CNI Bridge Note except that the 2013 CNI Bridge Note accrued interest at 10% per annum instead of 5% per annum. In April 2013, Ekso Bionics modified the 2012 CNI Bridge Note retroactively increasing the interest rate to 10%. Upon consummation of the Series B Financing in May 2013, the CNI Bridge Notes were converted into 2,446,916 shares of Series B Preferred Stock of Ekso Bionics (which were converted into 4,783,231 shares of Company Common Stock in connection with the Merger) and warrants to purchase 183,518 shares of common stock of Ekso Bionics (which were converted into 279,645 shares of Company Common Stock in connection with the Merger).

On October 21, 2013, The Chickasaw Nation Department of Commerce, an affiliate of CNI, purchased two receivables from Ekso Bionics for $180,000. The receivables represented payments due to Ekso Bionics from two customers totaling $199,410, for which The Chickasaw Nation Department of Commerce was paid in full on December 26, 2013.

Prior to consummation of the Merger, the entered into an agreement with CNI, whereby the Company agreed to nominate Daniel Boren, or another individual designated by CNI and reasonably acceptable to the remaining directors of the Company, for election as a director of the Company until the earlier of such time as CNI no longer holds at least 10% of the Company’s outstanding voting securities, or the shares of Common Stock held by CNI are no longer subject to a contractual lock-up agreement with the Company restricting the resale of such shares of Common Stock.

MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Our Common Stock is quoted on the OTC Markets (OTCQB) under the symbol “EKSO.” No shares of Common Stock had been traded as of December 31, 2013. Trading in shares of Common Stock in the OTC Markets commenced on or about January 17, 2014.

As of the date of this Report, we have 67,946,146 shares of Common Stock outstanding held by approximately 226 stockholders of record.

Dividend Policy

We have never paid any cash dividends on our capital stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our Common Stock in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain future earnings to fund ongoing operations and future capital requirements. Any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be dependent upon financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The Company had no equity compensation plans as of the end of fiscal year 2013.

On January 15, 2014, our Board of Directors of the Company adopted, and on the same date, our stockholders approved, the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, which reserves a total of 14,410,000 shares of our Common Stock for issuance under the 2014 Plan. As described below, incentive awards authorized under the 2014 Plan include, but are not limited to, incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). If an incentive award granted under the 2014 Plan expires, terminates, is unexercised or is forfeited, or if any shares are surrendered to us in connection with the exercise of an incentive award, the shares subject to such award and the surrendered shares will become available for further awards under the 2014 Plan.

The number of shares of our Common Stock subject to the 2014 Plan, any number of shares subject to any numerical limit in the 2014 Plan, to the terms of any incentive award or to any combination of the foregoing, is expected to be adjusted in the event of any change in our outstanding our Common Stock by reason of any stock dividend, spin-off, split-up, stock split, reverse stock split, recapitalization, reclassification, merger, consolidation, liquidation, business combination or exchange of shares or similar transaction.

Administration

The compensation committee of the Board, or the Board in the absence of such a committee, will administer the 2014 Plan. Subject to the terms of the 2014 Plan, the compensation committee or the Board has complete authority and discretion to determine the terms upon which awards may be granted under the 2014 Plan.

Grants

The 2014 Plan authorizes the grant to participants of nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, performance grants intended to comply with Section 162(m) of the Code and stock appreciation rights, as described below:

Duration, Amendment, and Termination

The Board has the power to amend, suspend or terminate the 2014 Plan without stockholder approval or ratification at any time or from time to time. No change may be made that increases the total number of shares of our Common Stock reserved for issuance pursuant to incentive awards or reduces the minimum exercise price for options or exchange of options for other incentive awards, unless such change is authorized by our stockholders within one year of such change. Unless sooner terminated, the 2014 Plan would terminate ten years after it is adopted.

As of the date hereof, options to purchase an aggregate of 9,886,459 shares of our Common Stock have been issued under the 2014 Plan. See “Description of Securities—Options” below for more information.

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

We have authorized capital stock consisting of 500,000,000 shares of Common Stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. As of the date of this Report, we had 67,946,146 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding, and no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding.

Common Stock

The holders of outstanding shares of Common Stock are entitled to receive dividends out of assets or funds legally available for the payment of dividends of such times and in such amounts as the board from time to time may determine. Holders of Common Stock are entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. There is no cumulative voting of the election of directors then standing for election. The Common Stock is not entitled to pre-emptive rights and is not subject to conversion or redemption. Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our company, the assets legally available for distribution to stockholders are distributable ratably among the holders of the Common Stock after payment of liquidation preferences, if any, on any outstanding payment of other claims of creditors. Each outstanding share of Common Stock is duly and validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.

Preferred Stock

We may issue shares of preferred stock from time to time in one or more series, each of which will have such distinctive designation or title as shall be determined by our Board of Directors and will have such voting powers, full or limited, or no voting powers, and such preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and such qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, as shall be stated in such resolution or resolutions providing for the issue of such class or series of preferred stock as may be adopted from time to time by the Board of Directors.

While we do not currently have any plans for the issuance of additional preferred stock, the issuance of such preferred stock could adversely affect the rights of the holders of Common Stock and, therefore, reduce the value of the Common Stock. It is not possible to state the actual effect of the issuance of any shares of preferred stock on the rights of holders of the Common Stock until the Board of Directors determines the specific rights of the holders of the preferred stock; however, these effects may include:

Other than in connection with shares of preferred stock (as explained above), which preferred stock is not currently designated nor contemplated by us, we do not believe that any provision of our charter or By-Laws would delay, defer or prevent a change in control.

Options

Options to purchase an aggregate of 9,886,459 shares of our Common Stock have been issued under the 2014 Plan, as follows:

Warrants

As of the date hereof:

The outstanding warrants, other than those converted from warrants to purchase Ekso Bionics Common Stock, contain “weighted average” anti-dilution protection in the event that we issue Common Stock or securities convertible into or exercisable for shares of Common Stock at a price lower than the subject warrant’s exercise price, subject to certain customary exceptions, as well as customary provisions for adjustment in the event of stock splits, subdivision or combination, mergers, etc.

See Item 2.01, “Completion of Acquisition or Disposition of Assets—The Merger and Related Transactions—Registration Rights” for a description of the registration rights granted to (among others) the holders of the PPO Warrants and the Agent Warrants, which description is incorporated herein by reference.

This summary descriptions of the warrants described above is qualified in their entirety by reference to the forms of such warrants filed as an exhibit to this Current Report.

Other Convertible Securities

As of the date hereof, other than the securities described above, the Company does not have any outstanding convertible securities.

Transfer Agent

The transfer agent for our Common Stock is VStock Transfer, LLC. The transfer agent’s address is 77 Spruce Street, Suite 201, Cedarhurst, NY 11516, and its telephone number is +1-212 828-8436.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business.

We are currently not aware of any pending legal proceedings to which we are a party or of which any of our property is the subject, nor are we aware of any such proceedings that are contemplated by any governmental authority.

INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

The Nevada Private Corporation Law and our Articles of Incorporation allow us to indemnify our officers and directors from certain liabilities and our By-Laws state that we shall indemnify every (i) present or former director or officer of us, (ii) any person who while serving in any of the capacities referred to in clause (i) served at our request as a director, officer, partner, venturer, proprietor, trustee, employee, agent or similar functionary of another foreign or domestic corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise, and (iii) any person nominated or designated by (or pursuant to authority granted by) the Board of Directors or any committee thereof to serve in any of the capacities referred to in clauses (i) or (ii) (each an “Indemnitee”).

Our By-Laws provide that we shall indemnify an Indemnitee against all judgments, penalties (including excise and similar taxes), fines, amounts paid in settlement and reasonable expenses actually incurred by the Indemnitee in connection with any proceeding in which he was, is or is threatened to be named as defendant or respondent, or in which he was or is a witness without being named a defendant or respondent, by reason, in whole or in part, of his serving or having served, or having been nominated or designated to serve, if it is determined that the Indemnitee (a) conducted himself in good faith, (b) reasonably believed, in the case of conduct in his official capacity, that his conduct was in our best interests and, in all other cases, that his conduct was at least not opposed to our best interests, and (c) in the case of any criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful; provided, however, that in the event that an Indemnitee is found liable to us or is found liable on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received by the Indemnitee, the indemnification (i) is limited to reasonable expenses actually incurred by the Indemnitee in connection with the proceeding and (ii) shall not be made in respect of any proceeding in which the Indemnitee shall have been found liable for willful or intentional misconduct in the performance of his duty to us.

Other than in the limited situation described above, our By-Laws provide that no indemnification shall be made in respect to any proceeding in which such Indemnitee has been (a) found liable on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received by him, whether or not the benefit resulted from an action taken in the Indemnitee’s official capacity, or (b) found liable to us. The termination of any proceeding by judgment, order, settlement or conviction, or on a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, is not of itself determinative that the Indemnitee did not meet the requirements set forth in clauses (a) or (b) above. An Indemnitee shall be deemed to have been found liable in respect of any claim, issue or matter only after the Indemnitee shall have been so adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction after exhaustion of all appeals therefrom. Reasonable expenses shall, include, without limitation, all court costs and all fees and disbursements of attorneys for the Indemnitee. The indemnification provided shall be applicable whether or not negligence or gross negligence of the Indemnitee is alleged or proven.

In addition to our By-Laws and our Articles of Incorporation, we intend to enter into an Indemnification Agreement with each of our directors pursuant to which we will be obligated to maintain liability insurance in favor of the directors serving the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates. We will also be required to indemnify, and to advance expenses on behalf of, such persons to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law and our governing documents. We believe that entering into the contemplated agreements will help attract and retain highly competent and qualified persons to serve the Company.

Other than discussed above, none of our By-Laws, our Articles of Incorporation or any indemnification agreement with any director of the Company includes any specific indemnification provisions for our officers or directors against liability under the Securities Act. Additionally, insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Company pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Company has been advised that, in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

The Bridge Notes and the PPO

The information regarding the Bridge Notes, the Bridge Warrants, the Bridge Agent Warrants, the PPO, the PPO Warrants and the PPO Agent Warrants set forth in Item 2.01, “Completion of Acquisition or Disposition of Assets—The Merger and Related Transactions—Bridge Notes” and “—The PPO” and “Description of Securities—Warrants” is incorporated herein by reference.

Shares Issued in Connection with the Merger

On January 15, 2014, pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, all of the shares of stock of Ekso were exchanged for 42,615,546 restricted shares of our Common Stock. This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as not involving any public offering. None of the securities were sold through an underwriter and, accordingly, there were no underwriting discounts or commissions involved.

In connection with the Merger, we issued 250,000 shares of our Common Stock to a consultant under a consulting agreement in consideration of business and consulting services provided by the consultant.

Sales of Unregistered Securities of Ekso Bionics

Set forth below is information regarding shares of common stock and preferred stock issued, and warrants granted, by Ekso Bionics within the past three years that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Also included is the consideration, if any, received by us for such shares, options and warrants and information relating to the section of the Securities Act, or rule of the Securities and Exchange Commission, under which exemption from registration was claimed. Share and per share stock numbers below in this Item do not give effect to the 3.462-for-one forward split of our Common Stock on December 16, 2013, and the Merger on January 15, 2014, in which each share of Ekso stock outstanding at the time of the Merger was automatically converted into shares of our Common Stock at the applicable conversion ration described elsewhere herein.

Series A Preferred Stock. Between December 7, 2010 and July 28, 2011, Ekso Bionics issued and sold 449,627 shares of Series A Preferred Stock (the “Ekso Series A Preferred Stock”), at a purchase price of $17.50 per share, to institutional and private investors, each of whom qualified as an accredited investor pursuant Regulation D under the Securities Act. The aggregate proceeds from the Ekso Series A Preferred Stock financing were approximately $7.7 million. Each share of Ekso Series A Preferred Stock was subdivided and reconstituted into ten shares of Ekso Series A Preferred Stock in connection with Ekso Bionics’ 10:1 stock split on September 20, 2011.

Series A-2 Preferred Stock. Between December 5, 2011 and February 7, 2012, Ekso Bionics issued and sold 4,335,414 shares of Series A-2 Preferred Stock (the “Ekso Series A-2 Preferred Stock”), at a purchase price of $2.10 per share, to new and current institutional and private investors, each of whom qualified as an accredited investor pursuant Regulation D under the Securities Act. The aggregate proceeds from the Ekso Series A-2 Preferred Stock financing were $9.0.

2012 Bridge Financing. In November 2012, Ekso Bionics entered into two convertible bridge note agreements pursuant to which Ekso Bionics issued convertible bridge notes in the aggregate original principal amount of $3,311,546 (the “2012 Series B Bridge Notes”) in anticipation of closing a Series B convertible preferred stock financing in early 2013.  In January through April 2013, Ekso Bionics issued additional convertible bridge notes in the aggregate original principal amount of $2,000,000 (the “2013 Series B Bridge Notes,” and collectively with the 2012 Series B Bridge Notes, the “Series B Bridge Notes”).  The 2012 Series B Bridge Notes carried interest at a rate of 5% per annum with a maturity date of November 12, 2013.  The 2013 Series B Bridge Notes had identical terms to the 2012 Series B Bridge Notes except that the 2013 Series B Bridge Notes accrued interest at 10% per annum instead of 5% per annum.  In April 2013, Ekso Bionics modified the 2012 Series B Bridge Notes retroactively increasing the interest rate to 10%.   The terms of conversion provided for issuance of a variable number of shares and warrants depending upon the timing of the Series B preferred stock offering. The aggregate proceeds from the Series B Bridge Notes were $5,311,546. All of the Series B Bridge Notes were converted into Ekso Series B Preferred Stock and common stock warrants in connection with the Series B Preferred Stock financing discussed below at a 15% discount.

Series B Preferred Stock. Between May 20, 2013 and September 27, 2013, Ekso Bionics issued and sold 5,179,344 shares of Series B Preferred Stock (the “Ekso Series B Preferred Stock”), at a purchase price of $2.10 per share, and common stock warrants to purchase up to 388,435 shares of common stock to new and current institutional and private investors, each of whom qualified as an accredited investor pursuant Regulation D under the Securities Act. The aggregate proceeds from the Series B Preferred Stock financing were $10.8, including the conversion of Series B Bridge Notes in the aggregate amount of $5,522,403.

Lender Warrants. On April 27, 2011, Ekso Bionics entered into a senior note payable agreement for an aggregate principal amount of $2,500,000 with Venture Lending & Leasing VI, Inc. (“VLL”), which was amended in May 2012 to provide for an additional $3,500,000 in funding. Under the original 2011 agreement, VLL received warrants to purchase 128,570 shares of Ekso Bionics’ Series A convertible preferred stock at an exercise price of $1.75 per share. These warrants expire on October 31, 2021.

In connection with the amendment to the senior note payable agreement in 2012, Ekso Bionics issued another warrant to VLL to purchase either Series A-2 Preferred Stock or the type of equity issued in Ekso Bionics’ next round of equity financing. The number of shares into which such 2012 warrant was exercisable varied based on the lowest price per share paid by an investor for the Series A-2 Preferred Stock (if VLL chose to exercise for Series A-2 Preferred Stock) or for the equity issued in Ekso Bionics’ next round of equity financing (if VLL chose to exercise for the next round stock).

In connection with the Merger, VLL and Ekso Bionics entered into a Warrant Exercise and Exchange Agreement pursuant to which VLL exercised the 2011 warrant on a cashless basis for 128,570 shares of Series A Preferred Stock and exchanged the 2012 warrant for 257,829 shares of Series B Preferred Stock and a warrant to purchase 19,337 shares of Common Stock for a purchase price of $2.10 per share, exercisable at any time from time to time prior to May 20, 2020 and otherwise in the same form as the warrants issued in connection with the Series B Preferred Stock financing discussed above.

In addition, in November 2013, in connection with VLL’s consent to the sale of the Bridge Notes and waiver of certain events of default under the senior note payable agreement, the Company issued to VLL a Bridge Warrant for 225,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock.

Development Agreement Warrant. In connection with the entry into a development agreement with a third party and as consideration for the third party’s services under the development agreement, on November 16, 2012 Ekso Bionics issued a warrant to purchase either shares of Ekso Series A-2 Preferred Stock or the type of equity securities of Ekso Bionics issued and sold in the next sale of Ekso Bionics preferred stock following the issuance of the warrant. The development agreement has since been terminated and the warrant was exercised on a cashless basis for 27,500 shares of Ekso Series B Preferred Stock.

Each of the issuances described above was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering. The recipients of securities in each transaction represented their intention to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view to or for sale in connection with any distribution thereof and appropriate legends were affixed to the share certificates and other instruments issued in such transactions.  None of these securities were sold through an underwriter and, accordingly, there were no underwriting discounts or commissions involved.

Options to Purchase Common Stock. For the period beginning January 15, 2011 through January 15, 2014, Ekso Bionics issued options to purchase an aggregate of 5,733,957 shares of Ekso Bionics’ common stock and 40,000 shares of restricted stock to certain employees, officers, directors and consultants under its 2007 Equity Incentive Plan. The exercise prices of such options (without giving effect to the adjustment of such exercise prices based on the conversion ratio used in the Merger) ranges from $0.594 to $1.52. Ekso Bionics received aggregate proceeds of approximately $59,087 for such period as a result of the exercise of these options. These transactions were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act in reliance on Rule 701 thereunder as transactions pursuant to compensatory benefit plans and contracts relating to compensation as provided under Rule 701 or under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering.

On January 15, 2014, Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPAs, was dismissed as our independent registered public accounting firm. On the same date, OUM & Co., LLP was engaged as our new independent registered public accounting firm. The Board of Directors of the Company approved the dismissal of Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPAs, and approved the engagement of OUM & Co., LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.

None of the reports of Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPAs, on our financial statements for either of the two most recent fiscal years or subsequent interim period contained an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, or was qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except that our audited financial statements contained in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2013, and March 31, 2012, filed with the SEC, included a going concern qualification in the report of Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPAs.

During the Company’s two most recent fiscal years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, and the subsequent interim periods preceding their dismissal, there were no disagreements with Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPAs, whether or not resolved, on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPAs, would have caused them to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with their report on the Company’s financial statements.

The Company provided Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPAs, with a copy of the disclosures it is making in this Report and has requested that Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPAs, furnish it with a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether they agree with the above statements. The letter has not yet been received but will be filed as an exhibit to this Form 8-K by amendment.

During the two most recent fiscal years and the interim periods preceding the engagement, and through the date of this Report, neither the Company nor anyone on its behalf has previously consulted with OUM & Co., LLP regarding either (a) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, and neither a written report was provided nor oral advice was provided to the Company that OUM & Co., LLP concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or (b) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in paragraph 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions thereto) or a reportable event (as described in paragraph 304(a)(1)(v)) of Regulation S-K).

The information regarding change of control of the Company in connection with the Merger set forth in Item 2.01, “Completion of Acquisition or Disposition of Assets—The Merger and Related Transactions” is incorporated herein by reference.

The information regarding departure and election of directors and departure and appointment of principal officers of the Company in connection with the Merger set forth in Item 2.01, “Completion of Acquisition or Disposition of Assets—The Merger and Related Transactions” is incorporated herein by reference.

On January 15, 2014, prior to the Merger, our Board of Directors amended and restated our By-Laws in their entirety. A copy of our amended and restated By-Laws is filed as an exhibit to this Report.

Also on January 15, 2014, prior to the Merger, our Board of Directors changed our fiscal year from a fiscal year ending on March 31 of each year, which was used in our most recent filing with the SEC, to one ending on December 31 of each year, which is the fiscal year end of Ekso Bionics. The report covering the transition period will be filed on Form 10-K as of and for the transition period ended September 30, 2013.

Prior to the Merger, we were a “shell company” (as such term is defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). As a result of the Merger, we have ceased to be a shell company. The information contained in this Current Report, together with the information contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, and our subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC, constitute the current “Form 10 information” necessary to satisfy the conditions contained in Rule 144(i)(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).

In accordance with Item 9.01(a), Ekso Bionics’ audited consolidated financial statements as of, and for the fiscal years ended, December 31, 2012 and 2011, and Ekso Bionics’ unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of, and for the nine months ended, September 30, 2013, and the accompanying notes, are included in this Report beginning on Page F-1.

In accordance with Item 9.01(b), the following unaudited pro forma financial information with respect to the Merger with Ekso Bionics reported in Item 2.01 of this Current Report on Form 8-K is furnished as Exhibit 99.1.

In reviewing the agreements included or incorporated by reference as exhibits to this Current Report on Form 8-K, please remember that they are included to provide you with information regarding their terms and are not intended to provide any other factual or disclosure information about the Company or the other parties to the agreements. The agreements may contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the applicable agreement. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the parties to the applicable agreement and:

Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time. Additional information about the Company may be found elsewhere in this Current Report on Form 8-K and the Company’s other public filings, which are available without charge through the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.